<?xml version="1.0"?>
<Articles JournalTitle="Archives of Anesthesiology and Critical Care">
  <Article>
    <Journal>
      <PublisherName>Tehran University of Medical Sciences</PublisherName>
      <JournalTitle>Archives of Anesthesiology and Critical Care</JournalTitle>
      <Issn>2423-5849</Issn>
      <Volume>4</Volume>
      <Issue>2</Issue>
      <PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
        <Year>2018</Year>
        <Month>04</Month>
        <Day>29</Day>
      </PubDate>
    </Journal>
    <title locale="en_US">Comparing Ondansetron with Ondansetron-Dexamethasone Combination on Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting after Elective Abdominal Surgeries: A Randomized Double Blinded Clinical Trial</title>
    <FirstPage>444</FirstPage>
    <LastPage>447</LastPage>
    <Language>EN</Language>
    <AuthorList>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Sussan</FirstName>
        <LastName>Soltani Mohammadi</LastName>
        <affiliation locale="en_US">Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Dr. Ali Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.</affiliation>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Zahra</FirstName>
        <LastName>Gholamhosseinzadeh Tabasi</LastName>
        <affiliation locale="en_US">Department of Anesthesiology, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Dr Shariati hospital, Tehran, Iran.</affiliation>
      </Author>
    </AuthorList>
    <History>
      <PubDate PubStatus="received">
        <Year>2018</Year>
        <Month>01</Month>
        <Day>08</Day>
      </PubDate>
      <PubDate PubStatus="accepted">
        <Year>2018</Year>
        <Month>03</Month>
        <Day>10</Day>
      </PubDate>
    </History>
    <abstract locale="en_US">Background: Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is an unpleasant and distressing complication after abdominal surgeries. We conducted a study to compare the efficacy of Ondansetron-Dexamethasone combination with ondansetron alone on PONV after abdominal surgeries under general anesthesia.
Methods: Two hundred patients undergoing elective abdominal surgeries under general anesthesia were allocated into two equal groups and anesthetised with the same technique. In one group combination of 8mg dexamethasone (2ml) and 4mg ondansetron (2ml) and in the other group ondansetron plus normal saline with the same volume was injected ten minutes before induction of anesthesia. PONV at recovery and during the first 24 hours after surgery were compared between the study groups.
Results: Twenty-two patients in ondansetron group and nine patients in ondansetron plus dexamethasone group had PONV respectively at first hour in recovery room (P=0.01). Eight patients in ondansetron group and no patient in ondansetron plus dexamethasone group had PONV at first 24 hours after surgery in the ward (P=0.007). In ondansetron group 21 patients and in combination group 7 patients needed intravenous metoclopramide as rescue medication for treatment of PONV in recovery (P=0.02). Two patients in ondansetron group needed intravenous rescue medication for treatment of PONV in the ward (P=0.01).
Conclusion: Dexamethasone plus ondansetron was more effective than ondansetron alone in preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting in patients undergoing elective abdominal surgeries.</abstract>
    <web_url>https://aacc.tums.ac.ir/index.php/aacc/article/view/176</web_url>
    <pdf_url>https://aacc.tums.ac.ir/index.php/aacc/article/download/176/320</pdf_url>
  </Article>
  <Article>
    <Journal>
      <PublisherName>Tehran University of Medical Sciences</PublisherName>
      <JournalTitle>Archives of Anesthesiology and Critical Care</JournalTitle>
      <Issn>2423-5849</Issn>
      <Volume>4</Volume>
      <Issue>2</Issue>
      <PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
        <Year>2018</Year>
        <Month>04</Month>
        <Day>29</Day>
      </PubDate>
    </Journal>
    <title locale="en_US">The Evaluation of Low Back Pain Prevalence in First Year of Anesthesiologists&#x2019; Career; A cross sectional study</title>
    <FirstPage>448</FirstPage>
    <LastPage>454</LastPage>
    <Language>EN</Language>
    <AuthorList>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Fariborz</FirstName>
        <LastName>Mehrani</LastName>
        <affiliation locale="en_US">Department of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Paramedicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.</affiliation>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Mahsa</FirstName>
        <LastName>Fadaee</LastName>
        <affiliation locale="en_US">Department of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Paramedicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.</affiliation>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Sahar Sadat</FirstName>
        <LastName>Dehghan Manshadi</LastName>
        <affiliation locale="en_US">Department of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Paramedicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.</affiliation>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Parisa</FirstName>
        <LastName>Gozali kalansara</LastName>
        <affiliation locale="en_US">Department of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Paramedicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.</affiliation>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Kosar</FirstName>
        <LastName>Ahmadi</LastName>
        <affiliation locale="en_US">Department of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Paramedicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.</affiliation>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Amirhossein</FirstName>
        <LastName>Orandi</LastName>
        <affiliation locale="en_US">Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.</affiliation>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Jayran</FirstName>
        <LastName>Zebardast</LastName>
        <affiliation locale="en_US">Deputy of Affairs, Imam Khomeini Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.</affiliation>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Ali-Akbar</FirstName>
        <LastName>Nejatisafa</LastName>
        <affiliation locale="en_US">Department of Psychiatry, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.</affiliation>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Saeed</FirstName>
        <LastName>Khorramnia</LastName>
        <affiliation locale="en_US">Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.</affiliation>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Negar</FirstName>
        <LastName>Eftekhar</LastName>
        <affiliation locale="en_US">Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.</affiliation>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Hossein</FirstName>
        <LastName>Majedi</LastName>
        <affiliation locale="en_US">Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.</affiliation>
      </Author>
    </AuthorList>
    <History>
      <PubDate PubStatus="received">
        <Year>2017</Year>
        <Month>12</Month>
        <Day>08</Day>
      </PubDate>
      <PubDate PubStatus="accepted">
        <Year>2018</Year>
        <Month>03</Month>
        <Day>10</Day>
      </PubDate>
    </History>
    <abstract locale="en_US">Background: Low Back Pain (LBP) is a common musculoskeletal disorder which may have an occupational or non-occupational etiology and is seen in many health care providers. It is an important cause of morbidity and workplace absence. Various factors may result in LBP but the role of occupational stress and anxiety personality disorder is still unclear.
Methods: Face-to-face interviews were conducted with 58 anesthesiologists working in the hospitals of Tehran University of Medical Sciences to evaluate the occurrence of LBP in the first year of work. The probable causes of LBP and the level of anxiety were assessed using a questionnaire designed for this purpose, based on Spielberger state-trait anxiety inventory (STAI), and the results were analyzed.
Results: Of 58 participants, 44 (75.9%) were men and 14 (24.1%) were women. The mean age of the participants was 45.6&#xB1;6.3 years. Twenty-four of 58 participants (41.4%) reported LBP in the first year of work. Six participants (10.3%) did not have anxiety state but had LBP in the first year of work. Eighteen subjects (31%) with mild to severe anxiety state also had LBP in the first year of work. Nine anesthesiologists (15.5%) did not have anxiety trait but had LBP in the first year of work. Fifteen participants (25.8%) had mild to severe anxiety trait and had LBP in the first year of work.
In general, 24 of 58 participants (41.4%) with an anxiety score of 47.52 (moderate level of anxiety) had LBP, and 34 of 58 participants with an anxiety score of 41.01 (moderate level of anxiety) did not have LBP. There was a significant correlation between the occurrence of LBP and the level of anxiety (P=0.014).
The personality type, smoking, history of psychiatric disorders, occupational satisfaction, communication with colleagues, sleep quality, history of LBP during work years, especially in the first year, duration of LBP, stress in the first year of work, and weekly hours of exercise had a significant association with anxiety (P&lt;0.05).
Conclusion: LBP is a multi factorial disorder of human. It seems that LBP can be related to stress and mechanical factors.</abstract>
    <web_url>https://aacc.tums.ac.ir/index.php/aacc/article/view/174</web_url>
    <pdf_url>https://aacc.tums.ac.ir/index.php/aacc/article/download/174/321</pdf_url>
  </Article>
  <Article>
    <Journal>
      <PublisherName>Tehran University of Medical Sciences</PublisherName>
      <JournalTitle>Archives of Anesthesiology and Critical Care</JournalTitle>
      <Issn>2423-5849</Issn>
      <Volume>4</Volume>
      <Issue>2</Issue>
      <PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
        <Year>2018</Year>
        <Month>04</Month>
        <Day>29</Day>
      </PubDate>
    </Journal>
    <title locale="en_US">The Clinical Effect of Oral Gabapentin/Clonidine Premedication on Postoperative Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Orthognathic Surgery</title>
    <FirstPage>455</FirstPage>
    <LastPage>458</LastPage>
    <Language>EN</Language>
    <AuthorList>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Mohammad Reza</FirstName>
        <LastName>Khajavi</LastName>
        <affiliation locale="en_US">Department of Anesthesiology, Sina Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.</affiliation>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Saba</FirstName>
        <LastName>Bahari</LastName>
        <affiliation locale="en_US">Department of Anesthesiology, Sina Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.</affiliation>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Reza Shariat</FirstName>
        <LastName>Moharari</LastName>
        <affiliation locale="en_US">Department of Anesthesiology, Sina Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.</affiliation>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Pejman</FirstName>
        <LastName>Pourfakhr</LastName>
        <affiliation locale="en_US">Department of Anesthesiology, Sina Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.</affiliation>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Farhad</FirstName>
        <LastName>Etezadi</LastName>
        <affiliation locale="en_US">Department of Anesthesiology, Sina Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.</affiliation>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Farsad</FirstName>
        <LastName>Imani</LastName>
        <affiliation locale="en_US">Department of Anesthesiology, Sina Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.</affiliation>
      </Author>
    </AuthorList>
    <History>
      <PubDate PubStatus="received">
        <Year>2018</Year>
        <Month>04</Month>
        <Day>15</Day>
      </PubDate>
      <PubDate PubStatus="accepted">
        <Year>2018</Year>
        <Month>04</Month>
        <Day>29</Day>
      </PubDate>
    </History>
    <abstract locale="en_US">Background: Postoperative acute pain management after maxillofacial surgery due to severity of pain and limitations of opioids use in these patients is of particular importance. The aim of this study was to evaluate the analgesic effect of oral gabapentin and clonidine combination and opioids requirements after surgery.
Methods: This study was a randomized clinical trial (RCT) on 70 patients (18-55 yr old ASAI to II) undergoing various types of Orthognathic surgeries in Sina hospital affiliated to Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran in 2016. The patients were randomly divided in two groups. Both groups received 1 gr (IV acetaminophen) 0.5 hour before the end of surgery. The control group received placebo and gabapentin/clonidine group received 300 mg gabapentin and clonidine 0.2mg orally 60 minutes before the induction of anesthesia. The pain severity score (assessed by VAS scale, the level of sedation (assessed by Sedation Agitation Scale), opioids requirement, nausea and vomiting were recorded in the post anesthesia care unit (PACU) 5 10, 20, 30 minutes and 3 hours after surgery. For rescue pain management intravenous morphine was administered.
Results: Seventy patients were enrolled in this study. Gabapentin/ Clonidine increase extubation time (20.3&#xB1;9.3min) (P&lt;0.05) compared to control group (14.8&#xB1;6.2 min). Gabapentin/ Clonidine decline the pain intensity, level of agitation and morphine requirement in the early minutes in recovery room. The incidence of PONV was also lower in gabapentin/clonidine group (5.7%) compared to control group (14.7%) p=0.005.
Conclusion: Premedication of oral gabapentin/ Clonidine increases extubation time and sedation score in patients recovering from Orthognathic surgery and could reduce postoperative pain scores and opioids consumption in recovery room.</abstract>
    <web_url>https://aacc.tums.ac.ir/index.php/aacc/article/view/180</web_url>
    <pdf_url>https://aacc.tums.ac.ir/index.php/aacc/article/download/180/322</pdf_url>
  </Article>
  <Article>
    <Journal>
      <PublisherName>Tehran University of Medical Sciences</PublisherName>
      <JournalTitle>Archives of Anesthesiology and Critical Care</JournalTitle>
      <Issn>2423-5849</Issn>
      <Volume>4</Volume>
      <Issue>2</Issue>
      <PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
        <Year>2018</Year>
        <Month>04</Month>
        <Day>29</Day>
      </PubDate>
    </Journal>
    <title locale="en_US">A Comparative Study on the Effect of Intravenous Hydrocortisone and Ketamine on Reducing Shivering after Spinal Anesthesia in Cesarean Section: A Double-blind Randomized Controlled Trial</title>
    <FirstPage>459</FirstPage>
    <LastPage>463</LastPage>
    <Language>EN</Language>
    <AuthorList>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Nahid</FirstName>
        <LastName>Manouchehrian</LastName>
        <affiliation locale="en_US">Department of Anesthesiology, Clinical Research Development Unit of Fatemi Hospital, School of Medicine, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran.</affiliation>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Mehdi</FirstName>
        <LastName>Sanatkar</LastName>
        <affiliation locale="en_US">Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.</affiliation>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Hossein</FirstName>
        <LastName>Kimiaei Asadi</LastName>
        <affiliation locale="en_US">Department of Anesthesiology, Clinical Research Development Unit of Fatemi Hospital, School of Medicine, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran.</affiliation>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Elahe</FirstName>
        <LastName>Soleimani</LastName>
        <affiliation locale="en_US">Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran.</affiliation>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Abbas</FirstName>
        <LastName>Moradi</LastName>
        <affiliation locale="en_US">Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran.</affiliation>
      </Author>
    </AuthorList>
    <History>
      <PubDate PubStatus="received">
        <Year>2018</Year>
        <Month>04</Month>
        <Day>18</Day>
      </PubDate>
      <PubDate PubStatus="accepted">
        <Year>2018</Year>
        <Month>04</Month>
        <Day>29</Day>
      </PubDate>
    </History>
    <abstract locale="en_US">Background: Shivering is rhythmic vibratory motions in one or more group of muscle that caused after general or local anesthesia. Prevention and early treatment of Shivering lead to not conflict with patient monitoring and also reduce cardio-respiratory and metabolic side effects in patients. The aim of this study is comparing effect of ketamine and hydrocortisone on reducing post spinal shivering.
Methods: In this prospective study, 150 pregnant women randomly were divided into three groups after Spinal anesthesia. Patients received 3cc hydrocortisone (2 mg/kg, A group), 3cc ketamine (0.5 mg/kg, B group) and 3cc normal saline (%0.9, C group) intravenously in 10-15 S duration after umbilical cord clamping. In all patients systolic and diastolic pressure, mean arterial pressure, heart rate, oxygen saturation level and body temperature were recorded before anesthesia and then every minute for 5 minutes, every 5 minutes for 15 minutes, every 10 minutes until the end of surgery. Also sedation score, hallucination, nausea and vomiting, intensity of shivering and using amount of pethidine and ephedrine were recorded in questionnaire.
Results: All three groups were similar in basic blood pressure, sensory and motor level. The rate of shivering in hydrocortisone group was significantly lower than control group (P=0.000). The rate of shivering in ketamine group was significantly lower than control group (P=0.00). Also the rate of shivering in hydrocortisone group was significantly higher than ketamine group (P=0.004).
Conclusion: Intravenous Hydrocortisone and ketamine are effective in reducing shivering occurring after spinal anesthesia in the cesarean surgery, however ketamine is significantly more effective than hydrocortisone in shivering control.</abstract>
    <web_url>https://aacc.tums.ac.ir/index.php/aacc/article/view/183</web_url>
    <pdf_url>https://aacc.tums.ac.ir/index.php/aacc/article/download/183/323</pdf_url>
  </Article>
  <Article>
    <Journal>
      <PublisherName>Tehran University of Medical Sciences</PublisherName>
      <JournalTitle>Archives of Anesthesiology and Critical Care</JournalTitle>
      <Issn>2423-5849</Issn>
      <Volume>4</Volume>
      <Issue>2</Issue>
      <PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
        <Year>2018</Year>
        <Month>04</Month>
        <Day>29</Day>
      </PubDate>
    </Journal>
    <title locale="en_US">Diagnostic Value of Troponin I and T to Predict Mortality in Patients Undergoing Hemodialysis</title>
    <FirstPage>464</FirstPage>
    <LastPage>467</LastPage>
    <Language>EN</Language>
    <AuthorList>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Seyed Taghi</FirstName>
        <LastName>Hashemi</LastName>
        <affiliation locale="en_US">Anesthesiology and Critical Care Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.</affiliation>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Babak</FirstName>
        <LastName>Alikiaii</LastName>
        <affiliation locale="en_US">Anesthesiology and Critical Care Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.</affiliation>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Samira</FirstName>
        <LastName>Ghasemi</LastName>
        <affiliation locale="en_US">Medical School, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.</affiliation>
      </Author>
    </AuthorList>
    <History>
      <PubDate PubStatus="received">
        <Year>2017</Year>
        <Month>11</Month>
        <Day>16</Day>
      </PubDate>
      <PubDate PubStatus="accepted">
        <Year>2018</Year>
        <Month>04</Month>
        <Day>09</Day>
      </PubDate>
    </History>
    <abstract locale="en_US">Background: There is no known biomarker to predict the mortality risk in patients undergoing dialysis in the intensive care unit (ICU). Therefore, the current study aimed to determine the diagnostic value of troponin I and T in this respect.
Methods: This prospective study included 70 patients, admitted to the intensive care unit, during 2016-2017, who need hemodialysis.
In these participants, the serum levels of troponin T and I were measured and the result of treatment was recorded in the patient&#x2019;s profile whether it was improvement or death.
Finally, we analyzed the diagnostic value of troponin T and I was predict the mortality in these patients in SPSS software version 20 through the Rock analysis.
Results: The mean of troponin I and T levels in alive patients were 0.47&#xB1;0.11 ng/ml and 0.67&#xB1;0.15 ng/ml, respectively and in dead were 0.49&#xB1;0.23 ng/ml and 1.06 &#xB1; 0.36 ng/ml, respectively. There was no significant difference between alive and dead patients in the mean of both troponins levels (P value&gt; 0.05). On the other hand, Rock analysis also demonstrated that statistically these two biomarkers did not have any significant diagnostic value to predict mortality (P value&gt; 0.05).
Conclusion: According to the results, it is conceivable that troponin I and T are not proper biomarkers to predict the mortality in patients undergoing dialysis in ICU and these biomarkers do not have a proper sensitivity and specificity for this purpose.</abstract>
    <web_url>https://aacc.tums.ac.ir/index.php/aacc/article/view/167</web_url>
    <pdf_url>https://aacc.tums.ac.ir/index.php/aacc/article/download/167/324</pdf_url>
  </Article>
  <Article>
    <Journal>
      <PublisherName>Tehran University of Medical Sciences</PublisherName>
      <JournalTitle>Archives of Anesthesiology and Critical Care</JournalTitle>
      <Issn>2423-5849</Issn>
      <Volume>4</Volume>
      <Issue>2</Issue>
      <PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
        <Year>2018</Year>
        <Month>04</Month>
        <Day>30</Day>
      </PubDate>
    </Journal>
    <title locale="en_US">Intraoperative Fluid Therapy for Major Surgeries: A Narrative Review</title>
    <FirstPage>468</FirstPage>
    <LastPage>476</LastPage>
    <Language>EN</Language>
    <AuthorList>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Zahid Hussain</FirstName>
        <LastName>Khan</LastName>
        <affiliation locale="en_US">Professor of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Deputy for Research, Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Imam Khomeini Medical Complex, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.</affiliation>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Kasra</FirstName>
        <LastName>Karvandian</LastName>
        <affiliation locale="en_US">Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Imam Khomeini Hospital Complex, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.</affiliation>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Jayran</FirstName>
        <LastName>Zebardast</LastName>
        <affiliation locale="en_US">Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Imam Khomeini Hospital Complex, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.</affiliation>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Hussein Ali</FirstName>
        <LastName>Hussein</LastName>
        <affiliation locale="en_US">Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Imam Khomeini Hospital Complex, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.</affiliation>
      </Author>
    </AuthorList>
    <History>
      <PubDate PubStatus="received">
        <Year>2017</Year>
        <Month>07</Month>
        <Day>28</Day>
      </PubDate>
      <PubDate PubStatus="accepted">
        <Year>2018</Year>
        <Month>03</Month>
        <Day>10</Day>
      </PubDate>
    </History>
    <abstract locale="en_US">Intraoperative fluid equilibrium is a decisive matter in perioperative anesthesia management, because most of evaluation studies consider intraoperative fluid administration as a major participating agent in improving or worsening patient outcomes after surgery and it revolves within the responsibility of an anesthesiologist. The unJournal>
      <PublisherName>Tehran University of Medical Sciences</PublisherName>
      <JournalTitle>Archives of Anesthesiology and Critical Care</JournalTitle>
      <Issn>2423-5849</Issn>
      <Volume>6</Volume>
      <Issue>4</Issue>
      <PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
        <Year>2020</Year>
        <Month>11</Month>
        <Day>22</Day>
      </PubDate>
    </Journal>
    <title locale="en_US">Accurate Tidal Volume for Patients under Mechanical Ventilation: A Cross-sectional Descriptive Study</title>
    <FirstPage>175</FirstPage>
    <LastPage>181</LastPage>
    <Language>EN</Language>
    <AuthorList>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Leila</FirstName>
        <LastName>Sayadi</LastName>
        <affiliation locale="en_US">Nursing and Midwifery Care Research Center, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.</affiliation>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Shahrzad</FirstName>
        <LastName>Ghiyasvandian</LastName>
        <affiliation locale="en_US">School of Nursing and Midwifery, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.</affiliation>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Ali</FirstName>
        <LastName>Karimi Rozveh</LastName>
        <affiliation locale="en_US">Department of Nursing, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.</affiliation>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Samira</FirstName>
        <LastName>Norouzrajabi</LastName>
        <affiliation locale="en_US">School of Nursing and Midwifery, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.</affiliation>
      </Author>
    </AuthorList>
    <History>
      <PubDate PubStatus="received">
        <Year>2020</Year>
        <Month>09</Month>
        <Day>17</Day>
      </PubDate>
      <PubDate PubStatus="accepted">
        <Year>2020</Year>
        <Month>10</Month>
        <Day>03</Day>
      </PubDate>
    </History>
    <abstract locale="en_US">Background: In order to prevent lung injury among patients under mechanical ventilation, tidal volume should be determined based on predicted body weight. The aim of the study was to determine the accuracy of tidal volume determination for patients under mechanical ventilation and to assess nurses&#x2019; knowledge about accurate tidal volume determination.
Methods: This was a cross-sectional descriptive study. This study was conducted on 250 patients under mechanical ventilation and 75 nurses who provided care to the patients. Patients&#x2019; height was estimated based on their ulna length and then, their predicted body weight and tidal volume were estimated. Nurses&#x2019; knowledge about tidal volume determination was also assessed.
Results: The mean of delivered tidal volume was 9.1&#xB1;1.73 mL/kg of predicted body weight. Tidal volume for 172 patients (68.8%) had been set at more than 8 mL/kg of predicted body weight. Forty nine nurses (65.3%) noted that there was no guideline in their wards for height and weight measurement. They determined patients&#x2019; weight and height through either visual estimation (21 nurses; 28.0%) or asking from their colleagues, patients, or patients&#x2019; family members (48 nurses; 64.0%).
Conclusion: Nurses have limited knowledge about accurate tidal volume determination and hence, deliver high tidal volume to patients under mechanical ventilation which puts them at risk for ventilator-associated lung injury. Urgent interventions such as lung-protective strategies, staff training, and careful managerial supervision are needed to prevent ventilator-associated lung injury and improve patient safety.</abstract>
    <web_url>https://aacc.tums.ac.ir/index.php/aacc/article/view/306</web_url>
    <pdf_url>https://aacc.tums.ac.ir/index.php/aacc/article/download/306/475</pdf_url>
  </Article>
  <Article>
    <Journal>
      <PublisherName>Tehran University of Medical Sciences</PublisherName>
      <JournalTitle>Archives of Anesthesiology and Critical Care</JournalTitle>
      <Issn>2423-5849</Issn>
      <Volume>6</Volume>
      <Issue>4</Issue>
      <PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
        <Year>2020</Year>
        <Month>11</Month>
        <Day>22</Day>
      </PubDate>
    </Journal>
    <title locale="en_US">Effect of Preoperative Dexmedetomidine on Prevalence of Postoperative Cognitive Dysfunction in Elderly Patients Candidate for Orthopedic Surgery under General Anesthesia</title>
    <FirstPage>182</FirstPage>
    <LastPage>187</LastPage>
    <AuthorList>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Alireza</FirstName>
        <LastName>Pournajafian</LastName>
        <affiliation locale="en_US">Department of Anesthesiology, Firoozgar Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.</affiliation>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Ali</FirstName>
        <LastName>Khatibi</LastName>
        <affiliation locale="en_US">Department of Anesthesiology, Firoozgar Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.</affiliation>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Mohammad Reza</FirstName>
        <LastName>Ghodraty</LastName>
        <affiliation locale="en_US">Department of Anesthesiology, Firoozgar Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.</affiliation>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Azadeh</FirstName>
        <LastName>Emami</LastName>
        <affiliation locale="en_US">Department of Anesthesiology, Ali Asghar Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.</affiliation>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Mona</FirstName>
        <LastName>Haji Aghajani</LastName>
        <affiliation locale="en_US">School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.</affiliation>
      </Author>
    </AuthorList>
    <History>
      <PubDate PubStatus="received">
        <Year>2020</Year>
        <Month>09</Month>
        <Day>14</Day>
      </PubDate>
      <PubDate PubStatus="accepted">
        <Year>2020</Year>
        <Month>10</Month>
        <Day>21</Day>
      </PubDate>
    </History>
    <abstract locale="en_US">Background: Postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD) is amongst the most critical complications after surgery. This study shows the effect of dexmedetomidine on the prevalence of postoperative cognitive impairment.
Methods: In this double-blinded clinical trial study, patients aged 60-80 years undergoing pelvic and femoral orthopedic surgery were randomly assigned in one of the two groups of the course, i.e., Dexmedetomidine (DEX) or normal saline (NS). We infuse One hour before anesthesia, one &#xB5;g/kg dexmedetomidine in the group (DEX), and the same volume of normal saline (NS). Mi