Correlation of Body Mass Index and Spread of Spinal block in Herniorrhaphy Patients Under Spinal Anesthesia
AbstractBackground: The level and time block in patients undergoing spinal anesthesia are affected by a variety of demographic factors (e.g., age, gender, height, weight, body mass index [BMI] and the amount of cerebrospinal fluid). Although the influence of BMI in spinal anesthesia is still a matter of controversy, the aim of this study was to determine the relationship between BMI and time of spinal block anesthesia in herniorrhaphy patients. Methods: One hundred and eighty patients, who had undergone an inguinal herniorrhaphy operation, were divided into two groups—obese (BMI ≥30kg/m2) and non-obese (BMI<30kg/m2). Demographic characteristics, operation time, anesthesia time, time sensory and motor block and changes in hemodynamics were compared between the two groups. The evaluation of spinal block height was recorded with the help of a pin-prick test and Bromage Scale after the administration of bupivacaine. Results: Body weight, height and BMI showed significant differences in the two groups and the time to reach sensory block T10 was significantly shorter in the group of obese patients. The time for recovery of sensory and motor block was longer in the obese group than in the non-obese group. Moreover, there were differences in the pattern of blood pressure of the two groups during surgery. Conclusion: The results of this study showed a correlation between BMI and the time of spinal block anesthesia. Furthermore, the maximum motor and sensory block specified in obese patients happens faster and the analgesic duration could be prolonged in patients with a higher BMI.
Leino KA, Kuusniemi KS, Pälve HK, Tiusanen HT, Tuppurainen TT. The effect of body mass index on the spread of spinal block in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Journal of anesthesia. 2011;25(2):213-8.
Morgan P. The role of vasopressors in the management of hypotension induced by spinal and epidural anaesthesia. Canadian journal of anaesthesia. 1994;41(5):404-13.
Kim H-J, Kim WH, Lim HW, Kim JA, Kim D-K, Shin BS, et al. Obesity is independently associated with spinal anesthesia outcomes: a prospective observational study. PloS one. 2015;10(4):e0124264.
Brodsky JB, Lemmens HJ. Regional anesthesia and obesity. Obesity surgery. 2007;17(9):1146-9.
Ingrande J, Brodsky JB, Lemmens HJ. Regional anesthesia and obesity. Current Opinion in Anesthesiology. 2009;22(5):683-6.
Pitkänen MT. Body mass and spread of spinal anesthesia with bupivacaine. Anesthesia and analgesia. 1987;66(2):127-31.
Barclay DL, Renegar O, Nelson Jr EW. The influence of inferior vena cava compression on the level of spinal anesthesia. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 1968;101(6):792-800.
Russell R. Assessment of motor blockade during epidural analgesia in labour. International journal of obstetric anesthesia. 1992;1(4):230-4.
Liguori GA, Zayas VM, Chisholm MF. Transient neurologic symptoms after spinal anesthesia with mepivacaine and lidocaine. Anesthesiology: The Journal of the American Society of Anesthesiologists. 1998;88(3):619-23.
Taivainen T, Tuominen M, Rosenber P. Influence of obesity on the spread of spinal analgesia after injection of plain 0.5% bupivacaine at the L3–4 or L4–5 interspace. British journal of Anaesthesia. 1990;64(5):542-6.
Mon W, Stewart A, Fernando R, Ashpole K, El-Wahab N, MacDonald S, et al. Cardiac output changes with phenylephrine and ephedrine infusions during spinal anesthesia for cesarean section: A randomized, double-blind trial. Journal of clinical anesthesia. 2017;37:43-8.
Chinachoti T, Tritrakarn T. Prospective study of hypotension and bradycardia during spinal anesthesia with bupivacaine: incidence and risk factors, part two. JOURNAL-MEDICAL ASSOCIATION OF THAILAND. 2007;90(3):492.