Research Article

Comparison of Caudal Epidural Ropivacaine Alone Versus Ropivacaine with Dexmedetomidine for Postoperative Analgesia in Lumbosacral Spine Surgery: A Randomized Double-Blind Study

Abstract

Background: Postoperative pain following lumbosacral spine surgery is often intense and may hinder early recovery and ambulation. Caudal epidural analgesia using local anesthetics, particularly when combined with adjuvants, has shown potential in enhancing pain control. Dexmedetomidine which has a high affinity for α2-adrenergic receptors, may augment the analgesic effects of ropivacaine and extend its duration. To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of caudal epidural administration of ropivacaine alone versus ropivacaine combined with dexmedetomidine in patients undergoing lumbosacral spine surgery under general anesthesia.
Methods: A total of 60 adult patients (ASA I–II) scheduled for elective lumbosacral spine procedures were enrolled in this prospective, randomised, double-blind trial. Participants were assigned to two groups. One group received 20 mL of 0.2% ropivacaine, and another group received 18 mL of 0.2% ropivacaine with 2 mL of dexmedetomidine (1 µg/kg). Pain scores, time to first rescue analgesia, sedation levels, hemodynamic parameters, and adverse events were monitored. Statistical evaluation was carried out with SPSS version 21, with significance set at p < 0.05.
Results: Patients who received dexmedetomidine showed lower pain scores at 4, 8, and 12 hours after surgery. Their average duration of postoperative analgesia was also longer (23.00 ± 4.33 hours) when compared with the control group (15.13 ± 1.74 hours). Sedation profiles and intraoperative hemodynamics were largely similar in both groups. No clinically important adverse effects, such as hypotension, bradycardia, or respiratory compromise, were observed.
Conclusion: Incorporating dexmedetomidine into a caudal epidural block with ropivacaine provides more effective postoperative pain relief without significant side effects.

[1] Loeser JD, Treede RD. The Kyoto protocol of IASP Basic Pain Terminology. Pain. 2008; 137(3):473-7.
[2] Butterworth JF, Mackey DC, Wasnick JD. Chronic Pain Management. In: Morgan & Mikhail’s Clinical Anesthesiology. 6th ed. McGraw-Hill; 2018.
[3] Dubin AE, Patapoutian A. Nociceptors: the sensors of the pain pathway. J Clin Invest. 2010; 120(11):3760-72.
[4] Murphy RW. Nerve roots and spinal nerves in degenerative disk disease. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1977; (129):46-60.
[5] Devereaux MW. Neck and low back pain. Med Clin North Am. 2003; 87(3):643-62.
[6] Chadduck JB, Sneyd JR, Pobereskin LH. The role of bupivacaine in early postoperative pain control after lumbar decompression. J Neurosurg. 1999; 90(1 Suppl):67-72.
[7] Waddell G. The back pain revolution. 2nd ed. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 2004.
[8] Wall PD, McMahon SB, Koltzenburg M, editors. Wall and Melzack’s Textbook of Pain. 5th ed. Edinburgh: Elsevier Churchill Livingstone; 2006.
[9] Kelly DJ, Ahmad M, Brull SJ. Preemptive analgesia I: physiological pathways and pharmacological modalities. Can J Anaesth. 2001; 48(10):1000-10.
[10] Crile G. The kinetic theory of shock and its prevention through anoci-association (shockless operation). Lancet. 1913; 182(4688):7-16.
[11] Wall PD. The prevention of postoperative pain. Pain. 1998; 75:289–90.
[12] Woolf CJ. Generation of acute pain: central mechanisms. Br Med Bull. 1991; 47(3):523-33.
[13] Grubb BD. Peripheral and central mechanisms of pain. Br J Anaesth. 1998; 81(1):8-11.
[14] Kehlet H, Holte K. Effect of postoperative analgesia on surgical outcome. Br J Anaesth. 2001; 87(1):62-72.
[15] Kehlet H. Acute pain control and accelerated postoperative surgical recovery. Surg Clin North Am. 1999; 79(2):431-43.
[16] Gan TJ. Poorly controlled postoperative pain: prevalence, consequences, and prevention. J Pain Res. 2017; 10:2287-98.
[17] Kao SC, Lin CS. Caudal Epidural Block: An Updated Review of Anatomy and Techniques. Biomed Res Int. 2017; 2017:9217145.
[18] Silvani P, Camporesi A, Agostino MR, Salvo I. Caudal anesthesia in pediatrics: an update. Minerva Anestesiol. 2006; 72(6):453-9.
[19] Meehan FP. Historical review of caudal epidural analgesia in obstetrics. Midwifery. 1987; 3(1):39-45.
[20] Dalens B, Hasnaoui A. Caudal anesthesia in pediatric surgery: success rate and adverse effects in 750 consecutive patients. Anesth Analg. 1989;68(2):83-9.
[21] Fawzi HM, Almarakbi WA. Effects of pre-emptive caudal dexmedetomedine-bupivacaine mixture in adult patients undergoing single level lumbar laminectomy: A prospective randomized study. Ain Shams J Anaesthesiol. 2012; 5:223-8.
[22] Kundra P, Gurnani A, Bhattacharya A. Preemptive epidural morphine for postoperative pain relief after lumbar laminectomy. Anesth Analg. 1997; 85(1):135-8.
[23] Kundra P, Deepalakshmi K, Ravishankar M. Preemptive caudal bupivacaine and morphine for postoperative analgesia in children. Anesth Analg. 1998; 87(1):52-6.
[24] Chen JS, Lau HP, Chao CC. Caudal block in vaginal delivery. Ma Zui Xue Za Zhi. 1987; 25(3):145-50. Chinese.
[25] Kalso EA, Pöyhiä R, Rosenberg PH. Spinal antinociception by dexmedetomidine, a highly selective alpha 2-adrenergic agonist. Pharmacol Toxicol. 1991; 68(2):140-3.
[26] Kakiuchi M, Abe K. Pre-incisional caudal epidural blockade and the relief of pain after lumbar spine operations. Int Orthop. 1997; 21(1):62-6.
[27] Saravana Babu M, Verma AK, Agarwal A, Tyagi CM, Upadhyay M, Tripathi S. A comparative study in the post-operative spine surgeries: Epidural ropivacaine with dexmedetomidine and ropivacaine with clonidine for post-operative analgesia. Indian J Anaesth. 2013; 57(4):371-6.
[28] Kamal M, Mohammed S, Meena S, Singariya G, Kumar R, Chauhan DS. Efficacy of dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to ropivacaine in pediatric caudal epidural block. Saudi J Anaesth. 2016; 10(4):384-9.
[29] Esmaoglu A, Yegenoglu F, Akin A, Turk CY. Dexmedetomidine added to levobupivacaine prolongs axillary brachial plexus block. Anesth Analg. 2010; 111(6):1548-51.
[30] Kumar S, Palaniappan JM, Kishan A. Preemptive Caudal Ropivacaine: An Effective Analgesic during Degenerative Lumbar Spine Surgery. Asian Spine J. 2017; 11(1):113-9.
[31] Kalappa S, Sridhara RB, Kumaraswamy S. Dexmedetomidine as an Adjuvant to Pre-Emptive Caudal Epidural Ropivacaine for Lumbosacral Spine Surgeries. J Clin Diagn Res. 2016; 10(1):UC22-4.
[32] Goyal V, Kubre J, Radhakrishnan K. Dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to bupivacaine in caudal analgesia in children. Anesth Essays Res. 2016; 10(2):227-32.
[33] Thimmappa M, Madhusudhana R, Potli S, Karthick D. A comparative study of epidural ropivacaine 0.75% alone with ropivacaine plus clonidine and ropivacaine plus dexmedetomidine for lower abdominal and lower limb surgeries. World J Pharm Pharm Sci. 2014; 3(4):1218-30.
[34] Bajwa SJ, Bajwa SK, Kaur J, Singh G, Arora V, Gupta S, et al. Dexmedetomidine and clonidine in epidural anaesthesia: A comparative evaluation. Indian J Anaesth. 2011; 55(2):116-21.
[35] Bharti N, Sardana DK, Bala I. The Analgesic Efficacy of Dexmedetomidine as an Adjunct to Local Anesthetics in Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Anesth Analg. 2015; 121(6):1655-60.
Files
IssueArticle in Press QRcode
SectionResearch Article(s)
Keywords
Dexmedetomidine Ropivacaine Caudal Epidural Block Postoperative Pain pine Surgery VAS Score

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
1.
Sharma M, Kaur K, Ajay A. Comparison of Caudal Epidural Ropivacaine Alone Versus Ropivacaine with Dexmedetomidine for Postoperative Analgesia in Lumbosacral Spine Surgery: A Randomized Double-Blind Study. Arch Anesth & Crit Care. 2026;.