Ropivacaine Versus Bupivacaine for Penile Block in Pediatric Circumcision: A Quasi-Randomized Clinical Trial
-
Rana Mohammad Yousef
,
Aqeel Jawad Abdulsahib
,
Razieh Ramezani
,
Afzal Shamsi
,
Elham Shahidi Delshad
Abstract
Background: Circumcision is one of the most frequently performed pediatric surgeries. Effective perioperative analgesia is essential to minimize pain, reduce stress responses, and facilitate early recovery. This study aimed to compare the analgesic efficacy, hemodynamic effects, and recovery outcomes of ropivacaine versus bupivacaine in penile nerve block among children undergoing circumcision.
Methods: In this quasi-randomized clinical trial conducted at Bahrami Children’s Hospital (Tehran, Iran) from November 2024 to January 2025, 66 male children aged 3 months to 3 years (ASA I–II) scheduled for elective circumcision were consecutively enrolled. Based on sequential allocation, participants received either 0.2% ropivacaine (Group R) or 0.25% bupivacaine (Group B) at 0.2 mL/kg for dorsal penile block. Hemodynamic parameters were recorded at key perioperative time points. Pain was assessed using the FLACC scale, and recovery time and fentanyl consumption were documented.
Results: Group R demonstrated significantly lower heart rates and higher systolic blood pressure at post-induction, post-incision, and end-of-surgery time points (p < 0.05). The need for intraoperative fentanyl was lower in group B (24.2% vs. 66.7%, p < 0.001), while postoperative FLACC scores were lower in Group R (p = 0.024). Recovery time was significantly shorter in the ropivacaine group (p < 0.001). No adverse events occurred.
Conclusion: Both drugs (ropivacaine and bupivacaine) were safe and effective. Ropivacaine provided better analgesia and faster postoperative recovery, while bupivacaine reduced intraoperative opioid use. These findings suggest that drugs should be selected based on individual clinical preferences.
[2] Reysner T, Wieczorowska-Tobis K, Kowalski G, Grochowicka M, Pyszczorska M, Mularski A, et al. The Influence of Regional Anesthesia on the Systemic Stress Response. Reports (Basel). 2024; 7(4):89.
[3] Melchior M, Kuhn P, Poisbeau P. The burden of early life stress on the nociceptive system development and pain responses. Eur J Neurosci. 2022; 55(9-10):2216-41.
[4] Reinstatler L, Shee K, Gross MS. Pain Management in Penile Prosthetic Surgery: A Review of the Literature. Sex Med Rev. 2018; 6(1):162-9.
[5] Bajwa DM, Majeed DA, Aziz-ur-Rahman DR. Caudal blocks vs. penile blocks: A prospective clinical study, in terms of surgical incision response for circumcision and post-operative analgesia requirements. Paragon Publishing. 2019.
[6] Zadrazil M, Feigl G, Opfermann P, Marhofer P, Marhofer D, Schmid W. Ultrasound-Guided Dorsal Penile Nerve Block in Children: An Anatomical-Based Observational Study of a New Anesthesia Technique. Children (Basel). 2023; 11(1):50.
[7] Martin‐Flores M, Lorenzutti AM. Local Anesthetic Pharmacology. Small Anim Reg Anesth Analg. John Wiley & Sons. 2024:35-44.
[8] Jin Z, Ding O, Islam A, Li R, Lin J. Comparison of Liposomal Bupivacaine and Conventional Local Anesthetic Agents in Regional Anesthesia: A Systematic Review. Anesth Analg. 2021; 132(6):1626-34.
[9] Broomhead C. Local anaesthetics. Neale’s Disord Foot Ankle. Elsevier. 2020:435-47.
[10] Kuthiala G, Chaudhary G. Ropivacaine: A review of its pharmacology and clinical use. Indian J Anaesth. 2011; 55(2):104-10.
[11] Arumugam S, Contino V, Kolli S. Local anesthetic systemic toxicity (LAST)–a review and update. Curr Anesthesiol Rep. 2020; 10(2):218-26.
[12] Pooja N. A Prospective Comparative Study Between Bupivacaine 0.5%, Levobupivacaine 0.5% and Ropivacaine 0.5% in Subarachnoid Block for Elective Lower Abdominal Surgeries: Rajiv Gandhi Univ Health Sci (India). 2018.
[13] Pushpa P. A Clinical Comparative Study Between Caudal Levobupivacaine-Clonidine and Ropivacaineclonidine for Post-Operative Analgesia in Paediatric Subumbilical Surgery: Rajiv Gandhi Univ Health Sci (India). 2017.
[14] Hegde S. A Prospective Randomised Double Blind Comparative Clinical Study of 0.5% Bupivacaine and 0.75% Ropivacaine for Sciatic Nerve Block in Patients Undergoing Elective Lower Limb Surgeries: Rajiv Gandhi Univ Health Sci (India). 2016.
[15] Shehu PU, Adamu AS, Tanimu SY, Tela MU, Wabada S, Adamu S. Comparison of the Success Rates and Haemodynamic Changes of Caudal Block and Dorsal Penile Nerve Block in Paediatric Day-Case Circumcision. Editorial Board. 2016; 16(1):14.
[16] Cinar SO, Isil CT, Sahin SH, Paksoy I. Caudal ropivacaine and bupivacaine for postoperative analgesia in infants undergoing lower abdominal surgery. Pak J Med Sci. 2015; 31(4):903-8.
[17] Crellin DJ, Harrison D, Santamaria N, Huque H, Babl FE. The Psychometric Properties of the FLACC Scale Used to Assess Procedural Pain. J Pain. 2018; 19(8):862-72.
[18] Chipde S, Banjare M, Arora K, Saraswat M. Prospective randomized controlled comparison of caudal bupivacaine and ropivacaine in pediatric patients. Ann Med Health Sci Res. 2014; 4 Suppl 2:S115-8.
[19] Khatavkar S, Durgumpudi VS. Enhancing Caudal Analgesia in Pediatrics: A Comparison of Ropivacaine With and Without Clonidine for Infra-Umbilical Surgeries. Cureus. 2024; 16(9):e68979.
[20] Dobereiner EF, Cox RG, Ewen A, Lardner DR. Evidence-based clinical update: Which local anesthetic drug for pediatric caudal block provides optimal efficacy with the fewest side effects? Can J Anaesth. 2010; 57(12):1102-10.
| Files | ||
| Issue | Article in Press |
|
| Section | Research Article(s) | |
| Keywords | ||
| Circumcision Pediatric Anesthesia Ropivacaine Bupivacaine Nerve Block | ||
| Rights and permissions | |
|
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
