rug-Related Problems and Clinical Pharmacist Interventions in Intensive Care Unit Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study
Abstract
Background: Drug-related problems (DRPs) are highly prevalent among critically ill patients in intensive care units (ICUs) and may negatively influence clinical outcomes. Pharmacist-led interventions play a pivotal role in detecting and resolving DRPs; however, their implementation and acceptance vary across healthcare systems.
Methods: This cross-sectional, descriptive-analytical study was conducted in the ICUs of Al-Zahra Hospital, Isfahan, Iran, during the second half of 2024. Adult patients admitted for more than 24 hours were evaluated for DRPs using Cipolle’s classification system. Data were obtained from medical charts, direct observation, and patient assessments. The severity of DRPs was graded using the NCC-MERP index, and pharmacist interventions as well as their acceptance by physicians were documented.
Results: A total of 100 patients were enrolled (60% male; mean age, 55.1 ± 18.1 years). A total of 324 DRPs were identified from 1,682 reviewed medication orders (mean of 3.24 DRPs per patient, with a median of 16.8 medication items received per patient). The most frequent categories were dosage too low (n = 68), ineffective drug therapy (n = 64), unnecessary drug therapy (n = 39), and dosage too high (n = 45). The most frequently implicated drugs were pantoprazole, acetaminophen (Apotel), vitamins and supplements, and broad-spectrum antibiotics including meropenem, vancomycin, and ceftazidime. Although 83% of drug-related problems (DRPs) caused no immediate harm, 18% led to actual patient harm. Clinical pharmacists offered several recommendations; however, only 18% of these were accepted by physicians.
Conclusion: Drug-related problems are very common among ICU patients, with dosing errors and unnecessary treatments being the most frequent types. The involvement of clinical pharmacists is essential for early detection and prevention, but the low rate of acceptance of their recommendations highlights the need for stronger interdisciplinary collaboration. Evidence from both international studies and Iranian research points to similar challenges, supporting the integration of clinical pharmacists into ICU teams as a key strategy to improve patient safety and treatment outcomes.
[2] van den Bemt PM, Egberts TC, de Jong-van den Berg LT, Brouwers JR. Drug-related problems in hospitalised patients. Drug Saf. 2000; 22(4):321-33.
[3] Linden-Lahti C, Takala A, Holmström AR, Airaksinen M. Applicability of drug-related problem (DRP) classification system for classifying severe medication errors. BMC Health Serv Res. 2023; 23(1):743.
[4] van Mil JW, Westerlund LO, Hersberger KE, Schaefer MA. Drug-related problem classification systems. Ann Pharmacother. 2004; 38(5):859-67.
[5] Albayrak A, Başgut B, Bıkmaz GA, Karahalil B. Clinical pharmacist assessment of drug-related problems among intensive care unit patients in a Turkish university hospital. BMC Health Serv Res. 2022; 22(1):79.
[6] Ho CK, Mabasa VH, Leung VW, Malyuk DL, Perrott JL. Assessment of clinical pharmacy interventions in the intensive care unit. Can J Hosp Pharm. 2013; 66(4):212-8.
[7] Jiang SP, Chen J, Zhang XG, Lu XY, Zhao QW. Implementation of pharmacists' interventions and assessment of medication errors in an intensive care unit of a Chinese tertiary hospital. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2014; 10:861-6.
[8] Cousins DD, Heath WM. The National Coordinating Council for Medication Error Reporting and Prevention: promoting patient safety and quality through innovation and leadership. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2008; 34(12):700-2.
[9] Blix HS, Viktil KK, Reikvam A, Moger TA, Hjemaas BJ, Pretsch P, et al. The majority of hospitalised patients have drug-related problems: results from a prospective study in general hospitals. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2004; 60(9):651-8.
[10] Gallagher P, Lang PO, Cherubini A, Topinková E, Cruz-Jentoft A, Montero Errasquín B, et al. Prevalence of potentially inappropriate prescribing in an acutely ill population of older patients admitted to six European hospitals. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2011; 67(11):1175-88.
[11] Al-Azzam SI, Alzoubi KH, AbuRuz S, Alefan Q. Drug-related problems in a sample of outpatients with chronic diseases: a cross-sectional study from Jordan. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2016; 12:233-9.
[12] Leape LL, Cullen DJ, Clapp MD, Burdick E, Demonaco HJ, Erickson JI, et al. Pharmacist participation on physician rounds and adverse drug events in the intensive care unit. JAMA. 1999; 282(3):267-70. Erratum in: JAMA. 2000; 283(10):1293.
[13] LeBlanc J, Smithburger P, Kram S, Tanner AR, Lohr B, Kane-Gill S. 944: Drug Related ICU Admissions. Crit Care Med. 2013; 41(12):A237.
[14] Farsad BF, Hadavand N, Salehi H, Shekari F. Carbapenems, Linezolid, Teicoplanin utilization evaluation in a large teaching based hospital (Shahid Rajaie heart center, Tehran): a quality improvement study. Biomed Pharmacol J. 2016; 9(2):525-32.
[15] Mahini S, Hayatshahi A, Torkamandi H, Gholami K, Javadi MR. Carbapenem utilization in critically Ill patients. J Pharm Care. 2013:141-4.
[16] Noormandi A, Karimzadeh I, Mirjalili M, Khalili H. Clinical and economic impacts of clinical pharmacists' interventions in Iran: a systematic review. Daru. 2019; 27(1):361-378.
| Files | ||
| Issue | Article in Press |
|
| Section | Research Article(s) | |
| Keywords | ||
| Drug-related problems (DRPs) Clinical pharmacist interventions Intensive care unit (ICU) Critically ill patients Medication safety Cipolle classification Iran | ||
| Rights and permissions | |
|
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |


