Comparative Study of Hemodynamic Changes and the Need for Inotropes in Patients Undergoing Cesarean Section with Spinal Anesthesia in Fowler and Left-Lateral Positions
Abstract
Background: Although spinal anesthesia is a suitable method of choice for cesarean section, there are many complications, including bradycardia and hypotension. Choosing a suitable position is an effective factor in controlling and reducing these complications. Based on this, this study was designed to investigate the hemodynamic status of pregnant patients undergoing cesarean section and spinal anesthesia in two positions, Fowler and left-lateral.
Methods: A total of 62 patients undergoing elective cesarean section surgery were enrolled in this single-center, prospective cohort trial and no blindness study. Patients aged 18-45 years in Shariati Hospital between February 2023 and September 2023 were entered for evaluation and follow-up. After spinal anesthesia, patients' vital signs, including respiratory rate, heart rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, mean arterial pressure, and percentage of arterial oxygen saturation, were recorded in minutes 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 15, 30, 45, and 60.
Results: From the beginning of spinal anesthesia until minute 4, systolic blood pressure in group Fowler dropped more severely than in group Left-lateral, and this difference was significant (P<0.001). The decrease in blood pressure from minute 1 to 4 was much higher in group Fowler than in group Left-lateral, and this difference was significant (P<0.001). Patients in group Left-lateral had a significantly lower respiratory rate than group Fowler (P=0.002). Changes in the percentage of oxygen saturation between the two groups were statistically insignificant. Although the frequency of receiving inotropes in the group of left-lateral patients was lower than in the group of Fowler patients (40% compared to 60%), this correlation was not significant.
Conclusion: Induction of spinal anesthesia in patients in the left-lateral position had lower hemodynamic changes and better stability than the Fowler position.
[2] Cyna AM, Andrew M, Emmett RS, Middleton P, Simmons SW. Techniques for preventing hypotension during spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006; (4):CD002251.
[3] Solangi SA, Khaskheli MS, Siddiqui MA. Comparison of the effects of general vs spinal anesthesia on neonatal outcome. Anaesth Pain Intensive Care. 2019:18-23.
[4] Lyons G. Saving mothers' lives: confidential enquiry into maternal and child health 2003-5. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2008; 17(2):103-5.
[5] Erango M, Frigessi A, Rosseland LA. A three minutes supine position test reveals higher risk of spinal anesthesia induced hypotension during cesarean delivery. An observational study. F1000Res. 2018; 7:1028.
[6] Kee WN. A random-allocation graded dose-response study of norepinephrine and phenylephrine for treating hypotension during spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery. Obstet Anesth Dig. 2018; 38(3):161-2.
[7] Mon W, Stewart A, Fernando R, Ashpole K, El-Wahab N, MacDonald S, et al. Cardiac output changes with phenylephrine and ephedrine infusions during spinal anesthesia for cesarean section: a randomized, double-blind trial. J Clin Anesth. 2017; 37:43-8.
[8] Dyer RA, Piercy JL, Reed AR, Lombard CJ, Schoeman LK, James MF. Hemodynamic changes associated with spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery in severe preeclampsia. Anesthesiology. 2008; 108(5):802-11.
[9] Hwang JW, Oh AY, Song IA, Na HS, Ryu JH, Park HP, et al. Influence of a prolonged lateral position on induction of spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial. Minerva Anestesiol. 2012; 78(6):646-52.
[10] Law ACS, Lam KK, Irwin MG. The effect of right versus left lateral decubitus positions on induction of spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery. Anesth Analg. 2003; 97(6):1795-9.
[11] Jeon YT, Hwang JW, Kim MH, Oh AY, Park KH, Park HP, et al. Positional blood pressure change and the risk of hypotension during spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery: an observational study. Anesth Analg. 2010; 111(3):712-5.
[12] Ali M, Sharif A, Naqvi SE. Comparison of the hemodynamic effects of lateral and sitting positions during induction of spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section using Hyperbaric Bupivacaine. Pak Armed Forces Med J. 2018; 68(1):45-9.
[13] Manouchehrian N, Moradi A, Torkashvand L. Comparative Study of Effect of Spinal Anesthesia in Sitting and Lateral Positions on the Onset Time of Sensory Block and Hemodynamic Condition in Cesarean Section: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Anesth Pain Med. 2021; 11(1):e111483.
| Files | ||
| Issue | Article in Press |
|
| Section | Research Article(s) | |
| Keywords | ||
| Cesarean Spinal Anesthesia Hemodynamic Inotrope | ||
| Rights and permissions | |
|
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |


