Prophylactic Lumbar Cerebrospinal Fluid Drainage after Anesthesia Induction in High-Risk Crawford Type I Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair: A Case Report
Abstract
Spinal cord ischemia (SCI) remains a devastating complication of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR), particularly in extensive aneurysms such as Crawford type I. Cerebrospinal fluid drainage (CSFD) is widely used to augment spinal cord perfusion pressure (SCPP); however, the optimal timing of CSFD placement (preoperative vs post-induction) remains controversial. A 61-year-old male with Crawford type I (maximum diameter 7 cm), history of cerebral infarction, NSTEMI, and hypoalbuminemia was scheduled for elective TEVAR using the chimney technique. After general anesthesia induction, CSFD was placed at L3-L4 (target CSFP 8-12 mmHg, rate 10-15 mL/h). TEVAR proceeded smoothly with stable hemodynamics (MAP 85-100 mmHg); the drain was removed on postoperative day 2 (48 h) without complications. Neurological status was normal, without PDPH, paraplegia, or infection.
This case shows that placing CSFD after induction can be a feasible and safe procedure of a multimodal neuroprotection strategy for high-risk TEVAR. Post-induction CSFD is an alternative to preoperative CSFD placement without compromising spinal cord protection. Further studies are needed to clarify the optimal timing and patient selection for CSFD in TEVAR.
[2] Tenorio ER, Oderich GS. Spinal cord protection: lessons learned from endovascular repair. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2023; 12(5):484-6.
[3] Chen CJ, Jiang H, Nguyen VDD. Prophylactic cerebrospinal fluid drainage and spinal cord ischemia in thoracic and thoracoabdominal endovascular procedures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2023; 12(5):392-408.
[4] Zheng H, Lin D, Cheng Y, Yan C, Yu S, et al. Systematic review of the effect of cerebrospinal fluid drainage on outcomes after endovascular type B aortic dissection repair. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2024; 19(1):116.
[5] Mazzolai L, Teixido-Tura G, Lanzi S, Boc V, Bossone E, et al. 2024 ESC Guidelines for the management of peripheral arterial and aortic diseases. Eur Heart J. 2024; 45(36):3538-700.
[6] Foley ED, Kumar V. Protecting the spinal cord during thoracic endovascular aortic repair-who should place the spinal drain? J Spine Surg. 2023; 9(2):186-90.
[7] Kemp C, Ikeno Y, Aftab M, Reece TB. Cerebrospinal fluid drainage in thoracic endovascular aortic repair: mandatory access but tailored placement. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2022; 11(1):53-55.
[8] Hiraoka T, Komiya T, Tsuneyoshi H, Shimamoto T. Risk factors for spinal cord ischaemia after thoracic endovascular aortic repair. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2018; 27(1):54-9.
[9] Mousa AY, Morcos R, Broce M, Bates MC, et al. New Preoperative Spinal Cord Ischemia Risk Stratification Model for Patients Undergoing Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair. Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2020; 54(6):487-96.
[10] Dias-Neto M, Reis PV, Rolim D, Ramos JF, Teixeira JF, et al. Strategies to prevent TEVAR-related spinal cord ischemia. Vascular. 2017; 25(3):307-15.
| Files | ||
| Issue | Article in Press |
|
| Section | Case Report(s) | |
| Keywords | ||
| Thoracic endovascular Aortic Repair Spinal Cord Ischemia Cerebrospinal Fluid Drainage Crawford type I aneurysm Neuroprotection | ||
| Rights and permissions | |
|
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |


