Research Article

Effect of General Anesthesia with Thiopental Sodium and Propofol on the 1- and 5 minute Apgar newborns by Cesarean

Abstract

Background: The Apgar score of newborn babies is a determining factor involved with mortality of newborns after birth. Regarding the disagreement on advantages and possible disadvantages of propofol and thiopental in the available references, the study was triggered with the aim of analyzing effects of two mentioned drugs on babies’ Apgar score.
Methods: In this double-blind clinical trial, a total of 100 healthy women who volunteered to undertake cesarean operation were selected and then divided randomly into two equal groups using statistical blocking. One group was treated by propofol while other one was treated by thiopental. The prescribed drugs for both groups were identical. Babies’ Apgar score 1 and 5 minutes after birth and recovery period and some of the critical maternal parameters after operation were recorded. The obtained data were analyzed by SPSS 19 software.
Results: Apgar score I minute 1 (p=0.317) and Apgar score in minute 5 (p=1.00) for propofol group were not different meaningfully. The groups had significant differences in the indices such as first systolic (P=0.00) and diastolic (P=0.00) pressure in recovery, last diastolic pressure in recovery (P=0.001) and duration of postoperative recovery (P=0.001). Statistical analysis of nausea and vomit in both groups showed that they are lower in propofol group rather than the thiopental group (p=0.000).
Conclusion: Propofol and thiopental did not differ significantly in Apgar score, but it seems that propofol can be a better option to induce anesthesia for an elective cesarean operation.

[1] Gholitabar M, Ullman R, James D, Griffiths M. Caesarean section: summary of updated NICE guidance. Bmj. 2011; 343:d7108.
[2] Gibbons L, Belizan JM, Lauer JA, Betran AP, Merialdi M, Althabe F. Inequities in the use of cesarean section deliveries in the world. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 2012;206(4):331.e1-19.
[3] Kumar A, Khinchi MP, Khan MS, Singh SP, Nagar L. PREGNANCY: AN OVERVIEW OF C-SECTION DELIVERY. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical Research and Development. 2017; 1:1-2.
[4] Kato R, Terui K, Yokota K, Nakagawa C, Uchida J, Miyao H. Anesthetic management for cesarean section in moyamoya disease: a report of five consecutive cases and a mini-review. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2006; 15(2):152-8.
[5] Bloom SL, Spong CY, Weiner SJ, Landon MB, Rouse DJ, Varner MW, et al. Complications of anesthesia for cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2005; 106(2):281-7.
[6] Andreae MH, Andreae DA. Regional anaesthesia to prevent chronic pain after surgery: a Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth. 2013; 111(5):711-20.
[7] Recker DC, Perry PM. Postsurgical pain syndromes: Chronic pain after hysterectomy and cesarean section. Techniques in Regional Anesthesia and Pain Management. 2011; 15(3):133-9.
[8] Moawad HE, El Hefnawy AS. Spinal vs. general anesthesia for percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A prospective randomized trial. Egyptian Journal of Anaesthesia. 2015; 31(1):71-5.
[9] Lew E, Yeo SW, Thomas E. Combined spinal-epidural anesthesia using epidural volume extension leads to faster motor recovery after elective cesarean delivery: a prospective, randomized, double-blind study. Anesth Analg. 2004; 98(3):810-4.
[10] Eltzschig HK, Lieberman ES, Camann WR. Regional anesthesia and analgesia for labor and delivery. N Engl J Med. 2003; 348(4):319-32.
[11] Mechanick JI, Kushner RF, Sugerman HJ, Gonzalez-Campoy JM, Collazo-Clavell ML, Guven S, et al. American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, The Obesity Society, and American Society for Metabolic & Bariatric Surgery Medical Guidelines for Clinical Practice for the perioperative nutritional, metabolic, and nonsurgical support of the bariatric surgery patient. Endocr Pract. 2008; 14 Suppl 1:1-83.
[12] Morgan BM, Magni V, Goroszenuik T. Anaesthesia for emergency caesarean section. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 1990; 97(5):420-4.
[13] Dresner MR, Freeman JM. Anaesthesia for caesarean section. Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 2001; 15(1):127-43.
[14] Shaaban MF, Kassem MM, Kammar EL, Mahmoud H, Korittum SA. Clinical Evaluation of Intravenous Propofol Alone or in Combination with Diazepam, Ketamine Hcl and Thiopental Sodium to Induce General Anaesthesia in Dogs. Alexandria Journal for Veterinary Sciences. 2018;57(1):106-114.
[15] Mahjoubifard M, Heidari M, Dahmardeh M, Mirtajani SB, Jahangirifard A. Comparison of Dexmedetomidine, Lidocaine, and Fentanyl in Attenuation Hemodynamic Response of Laryngoscopy and Intubation in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery. Anesthesiol Res Pract. 2020; 2020:4814037.
[16] Gardner DK, Weissman A, Howles CM, Shoham Z, editors. Textbook of assisted reproductive techniques fourth edition: volume 2: Clinical perspectives. CRC press; 2012; 27:114-115.
[17] Hynson JM, Sessler DI, Moayeri A, McGuire J, Schroeder M. The effects of preinduction warming on temperature and blood pressure during propofol/nitrous oxide anesthesia. Anesthesiology. 1993; 79(2):219-8.
[18] He YL, Tsujimoto S, Tanimoto M, Okutani R, Murakawa K, Tashiro C. Effects of protein binding on the placental transfer of propofol in the human dually perfused cotyledon in vitro. British journal of anaesthesia. 2000; 85(2):281-6.
[19] American Academy of Pediatrics. The Apgar score. Adv Neonatal Care. 2006; 6(4):220-3.
[20] Gawande AA, Kwaan MR, Regenbogen SE, Lipsitz SA, Zinner MJ. An Apgar score for surgery J Am Coll Surg. 2007; 204(2):201-8.
[21] Gin T, Gregory MA, Oh TE. The haemodynamic effects of propofol and thiopentone for induction of caesarean section. Anaesth Intensive Care. 1990; 18(2):175-9.
[22] Celleno D, Capogna G, Emanuelli M, Varrassi G, Muratori F, Costantino P, Sebastiani M. Which induction drug for cesarean section? A comparison of thiopental sodium, propofol, and midazolam. J Clin Anesth. 1993; 5(4):284-8.
[23] Valtonen M, Kanto J, Rosenberg P. Comparison of propofol and thiopentone for induction of anaesthesia for elective caesarean section. Anaesthesia. 1989; 44(9):758-62.
[24] Ghodrati M, Akhavan-akbari G, Amani F. Comparison of propofol and thiopental for induction of anaesthesia for elective Caesarean section on aogar score. Persian. Res Sci J Ardabil Univ Med Sci Health Ser. 2003; 3(9):52-8.
[25] Djordjević B, Stojiljković MP, Mostić T, Vojvodić L, Loncar-Stojiljković D. Propofol and thiopentone in elective cesarean section: effect on the mother and neonate. Vojnosanit Pregl. 1998; 55(6):601-4.
Files
IssueVol 7 No 1 (2021): Winter QRcode
SectionResearch Article(s)
Published2021-02-03
DOI https://doi.org/10.18502/aacc.v7i1.5479
Keywords
General Anesthesia Thiopental Sodium Propofol Apgar Cesarean

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
1.
Yusefi Moghadam M, Davarinia Motlagh Quchan A, Eftekhariyazdi M, Khalili-Shomia S. Effect of General Anesthesia with Thiopental Sodium and Propofol on the 1- and 5 minute Apgar newborns by Cesarean. Arch Anesth & Crit Care. 7(1):33-7.