Research Article

Assessment of Psychomotor Recovery after Etomidate and Propofol Induction: A Randomized Double-Blind Trial

Abstract

Background: The very idea of faster recovery and early ambulation has prompted patients to opt for day care surgeries. The concept of ERAS (enhanced recovery after surgery) is the backbone to achieve this goal. We conducted this study with primary objective to compare the post-operative recovery with etomidate and propofol in terms of early recovery (awakening), intermediate recovery (psychomotor and cognitive recovery) and ambulation “home readiness” and secondary objective to study the adverse effects.
Methods: 60 eligible patients scheduled for day care gynaecological procedures were randomised in two groups of 30 each. Group E received etomidate 0.2mg/kg and group P received propofol 2mg/kg. Early, intermediate and late postoperative recovery (ambulation) was studied in both groups.
Results: Demography between the groups were comparable while hemodynamic fluctuations were more with propofol (p>0.05), early recovery was faster with etomidate (p = 0.07), psychomotor tests revealed better alertness with etomidate (p= 0.1) and patient could ambulate earlier in etomidate group.
Conclusion: Both propofol and Etomidate facilitate early recovery but etomidate provides hemodynamic stability with early awakening, more alert patients and better ambulation and was found to be superior for day care surgeries.

[1] Korttila K, Nuotto EJ, Lichtor JL, Ostman PL, Apfelbaum J, Rupani G. Clinical recovery and psychomotor function after brief anesthesia with propofol or thiopental. Anesthesiology. 1992; 76(5):676-81.
[2] Korttila K. Recovery from propofol: does it really make a difference? J Clin Anesth. 1993; 5(6):443-6.
[3] Korttila K, Ostman P, Faure E, Apfelbaum JL, Prunskis J, Ekdawi M, et al. Randomized comparison of recovery after propofol-nitrous oxide versus thiopentone-isoflurane-nitrous oxide anaesthesia in patients undergoing ambulatory surgery. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1990; 34(5):400-3.
[4] Meng QT, Cao C, Liu HM, Xia ZY, Li W, Tang LH, et al. Safety and efficacy of etomidate and propofol anesthesia in elderly patients undergoing gastroscopy: A double-blind randomized clinical study. Exp Ther Med. 2016; 12(3):1515-24.
[5] Mayer M, Doenicke A, Nebauer AE, Hepting L. Propofol und Etomidat-Lipuro zur Einleitung einer Allgemeinanästhesie. Hämodynamik, Venenverträglichkeit, subjektives Empfinden und postoperative Ubelkeit [Propofol and etomidate-Lipuro for induction of general anesthesia. Hemodynamics, vascular compatibility, subjective findings and postoperative nausea]. Anaesthesist. 1996; 45(11):1082-4.
[6] Kahokehr A, Sammour T, Zargar-Shoshtari K, Thompson L, Hill AG. Implementation of ERAS and how to overcome the barriers. Int J Surg. 2009; 7(1):16-9.
[7] Kehlet H, Wilmore DW. Multimodal strategies to improve surgical outcome. Am J Surg. 2002; 183(6):630-41.
[8] White PF, Kehlet H, Neal JM, Schricker T, Carr DB, Carli F; Fast-Track Surgery Study Group. The role of the anesthesiologist in fast-track surgery: from multimodal analgesia to perioperative medical care. Anesth Analg. 2007;104(6):1380-96.
[9] Papaspyros S, Uppal S, Khan SA, Paul S, O'Regan DJ. Analysis of bedside entertainment services' effect on post cardiac surgery physical activity: a prospective, randomised clinical trial. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2008; 34(5):1022-6.
[10] Massey RL. A randomized trial of rocking-chair motion on the effect of postoperative ileus duration in patients with cancer recovering from abdominal surgery. Appl Nurs Res. 2010; 23(2):59-64.
[11] Aggarwal S, Goyal VK, Chaturvedi SK, Mathur V, Baj B, Kumar A. Estudo comparativo entre propofol e etomidato em pacientes sob anestesia geral [A comparative study between propofol and etomidate in patients under general anesthesia]. Rev Bras Anestesiol. 2016; 66(3):237-41.
[12] Briggs LP, Clarke RS, Dundee JW, Moore J, Bahar M, Wright PJ. Use of di-isopropyl phenol as main agent for short procedures. Br J Anaesth. 1981; 53(11):1197-202.
[13] Ebert TJ, Muzi M, Berens R, Goff D, Kampine JP. Sympathetic responses to induction of anesthesia in humans with propofol or etomidate. Anesthesiology. 1992; 76(5):725-33.
[14] Wu J, Yao S, Wu Z, Wu Z, Chu S, Xia G, et al. A comparison of anesthetic regimens using etomidate and propofol in patients undergoing first-trimester abortions: double-blind, randomized clinical trial of safety and efficacy. Contraception. 2013; 87(1):55-62.
[15] Prys-roberts c. Haemodynamic effects of 'diprivan' infusion anaesthesia; comparison with other intravenous and volatile anaesthetics. Vii european congress of anaesthesiology abstracts iii; 1986; 296.
[16] Grounds RM, Twigley AJ, Carli F, Whitwam JG, Morgan M. The haemodynamic effects of intravenous induction. Comparison of the effects of thiopentone and propofol. Anaesthesia. 1985; 40(8):735-40.
[17] Toklu S, Iyilikci L, Gonen C, Ciftci L, Gunenc F, Sahin E, et al. Comparison of etomidate-remifentanil and propofol-remifentanil sedation in patients scheduled for colonoscopy. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2009; 26(5):370-6.
[18] Pawar S, Malde A. Time course of psychomotor, cognitive and ambulatory recovery after propofol day case anesthesia: a randomized double blind study. The internet journal of anesthesiology. 2010; 23(1).
Files
IssueVol 7 No 3 (2021): Summer QRcode
SectionResearch Article(s)
Published2021-07-31
DOI https://doi.org/10.18502/aacc.v7i3.6900
Keywords
psychomotor propofol etomidate myoclonus recovery

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
1.
Kale J, Panse N, Maske K, Nighukar P. Assessment of Psychomotor Recovery after Etomidate and Propofol Induction: A Randomized Double-Blind Trial. Arch Anesth & Crit Care. 2021;7(3):132-137.