Morphometric Analysis Sacral Hiatus of Dry Bone in Iranian Population
Abstract
Background: Caudal epidural block (CEB) has been widely used to treat lumbar spine disorders, to manage chronic low back pain, and to provide analgesia and anesthesia in operations such as labor pain and orthopedic and genital surgeries. The CEB technique depends on the precise location of the sacral hiatus (SH) through which access to the sacral epidural space is obtained. For optimal access to the sacral epidural space, accurate knowledge of the SH descriptive profile is required.
Methods: The study was performed on 23 sacrum bones. All bones were of Iranian (Persian) origin. Bones that were worn, corroded, broken, or had any anatomical problems were excluded. The parameters were measured: Sacral hiatus Length, distance between base of hiatuse-S2, liner distances between apex of sacral hiatus till right and left ends of lateral sacral crest were measured. Distance between Apex of sacral hiatus till S2, Antherio-posterior diameter of SH and location of sacral hiatus and types of SH.
Results: This study showed that the highest type of sacral hiatus in Iranians with a frequency of 38% is inverted V shape and the lowest type of deficiency shape is with a frequency of 4.8%.
The position of sacral hiatus in the Iranian sacrum showed that the highest position was with a frequency of 45% in front of the sacral vertebra 4 and the lowest case in front of the third sacral with a frequency of 15%. The height of sacral hiatus was the highest case with a height of 21-30 mm (50% or cases 9). Anterior-posterior diameter of sacral hiatus was 4-6 mm in The most common case 75% or cases 15.
It was shown that the mean distances between S2 till apex of the sacral hiatus 56.65 mm and the mean distance between S2 till base of the sacral hiatus is 36.85 mm.
Conclusion: Successful application CEB enables comfortable anesthesia for patients and helps them to resume an active life soon. Accurate understanding of the SH location is important to reduce the risk of intraoperative as well as damage to vital structures. The present study aimed to determine positional changes and measure SH distances. Also, the aim of this study was to determine SH landmark points, perform accurate and standard morphometric measurements and calculate safe SH areas in CEB application.
[2] Waldman SD. Caudal epidural block: Prone Position-Atlas of interventional pain management. 2nd Ed. Philadelphia: Saunders, 2004, pp-380-92.
[3] Senoglu N, Senoglu M, Oksuz H, Gumusalan Y, Yuksel KZ, Zencirci B, et al. Landmarks of the sacral hiatus for caudal epidural block: an anatomical study. Br J Anaesth. 2005; 95(5):692-5.
[4] Sekiguchi M, Yabuki S, Saton K, Kikuchi S. An anatomical study of the sacral hiatus: a basis for successful caudal epidural block. Clin J Pain. 2004; 20: 51-4.
[5] Sheng C. K., Chia-Sh. L. Caudal Epidural Block: An Updated Review of Anatomy and Techniques, Biomed Res Int. 2017; 2017: 9217145.
[6] Bagheri H, Govsa F. Anatomy of the sacral hiatus and its clinical relevance in caudal epidural block. Surg Radiol Anat. 2017; 39(9):943-951
[7] Bhattacharya S, Majumdar S, Chakraborty P, Mazumdar S, Mazumdar A. A morphometric study of sacral hiatus for caudal epidural block among the population of West Bengal. Indian Journal of Basic & Applied Medical Research. 2013; 7(2):660-667.
[8] Waldman SD. Caudal epidural block: Prone position-Atlas of interventional pain management. 2nd Ed. Philadelphia: Saunders, 2004, pp-380-92.
[9] Joshi, M B. Study of Dorsal Sacral Triangle In Human Sacra. International Journal of Medical and Biomedical Studies,2020; 4(2).
[10] Joshi MB. Morphology and Morphometry of Scapular Acromion Process. International Journal of Medical and Biomedical Studies. 2020; 4(1):272-4.
[11] Nasr AY, Ali YH, ElSawy N, Elsawy NA. The Sacral Hiatus: An Anatomic Study on Both Cadaveric and Dry Bones. Translational Clinical Biology. 2014; 2(1):4-12.
[12] Shinde A, Manvikar PR, Bharambe VK. Morphometric study of sacral hiatus and its significance in caudal epidural anesthesia. 2015; 18(3):134-8.
[13] Nadeem G. Importance of knowing the level of sacral hiatus for caudal epidural anesthesia. Journal of Morphological Sciences. 2014; 31(1): 9-13.
[14] Shinde A, Purushottam R M., Vaishaly K. Bharambe N. Dorsal sacral agenesis: A study on dry sacrum bones. 2018; 5(2): 157-160.
[15] Chauhan R, Nagar M. Anatomical Profile and Morphometric Evaluation of Human Sacral Hiatus in North Indians. Journal of Surgical Academia. 2015; 5(2):8-12.
[16] Njihia BN, Awori KO, Gikenye G. Morphology of the Sacral Hiatus in an African Population – Implications for Caudal Epidural Injections. The Annals of African Surgery. 2011; 7.
Files | ||
Issue | Vol 8 No 3 (2022): Summer | |
Section | Research Article(s) | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.18502/aacc.v8i3.9604 | |
Keywords | ||
Caudal epidural block morphometry sacrum sacral hiatus sacral cornua. |
Rights and permissions | |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |