Comparison of Crystalloid Preloading with Co-Loading on Maternal Hemodynamics in Elective Lower Segment Caesarean Section under Spinal Anaesthesia
,
Abstract
Background: Spinal anaesthesia is the most common technique used for lower segment caesarean sections(LSCS). but it has own disadvantages too. Maternal haemodynamic changes is more profound in pregnant population. Aim of the study was to compare the maternal haemodynamic changes with crystalloid preloading and co-loading in patients undergoing elective lower segment caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia.
Methods: 80 obstetric patients with period of gestation (POG) more than 37 weeks, in the age between 18 to 35 years, belonging to ASA class I and II and scheduled for elective LSCS were randomized into two groups. Group P - Patient receiving preloading with Ringer Lactate at a dose of 15ml/kg. Group C – Patient receiving Co-loading with Ringer Lactate at a dose of 15ml/kg. Primary objectives of the study were haemodynamic changes like Heart rate (HR), Systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) and these parameters were recorded baseline, at 1 min interval for first 10 minutes, after that at 5 minutes till 20 minutes and then every 15 min till completion of procedure.
Results: The demographic data were comparable in group P and group C. The mean (SD) HR was significantly higher in group P as compared to group C at 5,6,7,8 and 9 minutes (p <0.05). The mean (SD) SBP, DBP and MBP was significantly lower in group P as compared to group C at 5,6 and 7 minutes (p <0.05). Significant difference was seen in the distribution of nausea/vomiting score between group P and C. (p value<.05).
Conclusion: We conclude that co-loading with crystalloids is provide more Maternal Hemodynamics stability after subarachnoid block rather than preloading with crystalloids.
[2] Ngan Kee WD. Prevention of maternal hypotension after regional anaesthesia for caesarean section. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2010; 23(3): 304–9.
[3] Bajwa SK, Bajwa SJ. Delivering obstetrical critical care in developing nations. Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci. 2012; 2(1):32-9.
[4] Reynolds F, Seed PT. Anaesthesia for Caesarean section and neonatal acid-base status: a meta-analysis. Anaesthesia. 2005; 60(7):636-53.
[5] Patil A, Chavan R, Mudalagirigowda S, Adda S. A Comparative Study to Evaluate the Effect of Norepinephrine and Phenylephrine in the Treatment of Post Spinal Hypotension for Caesarean Section. Arch Anesth & Crit Care. 2022; 8(1):25-28
[6] Gin T, Lee A, Patil A, Chavan R, Mudalagirigowda S, Adda S. A Comparative Study to Evaluate the Effect of Norepinephrine and Phenylephrine in the Treatment of Post Spinal Hypotension for Caesarean Section. Arch Anesth & Crit Care. 2022; 8(1):25-28
[7] Wollman SB, Marx S. Acute hydration for prevention of hypotension of spinal anaesthesia parturient. Anaesthesiology. 1968; 29: 374-80.
[8] Hahn RG, Lyons G. The half-life of infusion fluids: An educational review. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2016; 33(7):475-82.
[9] MacLennan FM, MacDonald AF, Campbell DM. Lung water during the puerperium. Anaesthesia. 1987; 42(2):141-7.
[10] Miller RD, Erikson LI, Fleisher LA, Wiwner–Kronish JA, Young WL. Chapter 88: Postoperative intravascular fluid therapy. Millers Anaesthesia, 7th Edition. Churchill Livingstone Elsvier Publication Private Limited; pp. 3783 – 3803.
[11] Mercire FJ, Roger-Christoph S, Des M S, Westerman M, Foiret C, Mercier FJ, et al. Crystalloid pre-loading vs. post-loading for the prevention of hypotension with spinal anesthesia for caesarean delivery. Anesthesiology. 2004;100: A18.
[12] Mojica JL, Bautista LE, Melendez HJ. The timing of intravenous crystalloid administration and incidence of cardiovascular side effects during spinal anesthesia: the results from a randomised controlled trial. Anesth Analg. 2002; 94: 432-7
[13] Kulkarni GA, Asai O, Tarkase A. Comparitive evaluation of co-loading versus preloading for prevention of post spinal hypotension. IJCA. 2016; 3(3): 340-346
[14] Birnbach DJ, Browne IM. Anesthesia for obstetrics. Miller's Anesthesia, 2nd volume. In: Miller RD (Ed). Philadelphia: Elsevier Churchill Livingstone; 2010. pp. 2203-40.
[15] Cyna AM, Andrew M, Emmett RS, Middleton P, Simmons SW. Techniques for preventing hypotension during spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006: 4.
[16] Borse DY, Patil DA, Subhedar DR, Sangale DS. Comparative study of preloading and Co-loading with ringer lactate for prevention of spinal hypotension in elective cesarean section. International J Med Anesth. 2020; 3(1):30-2.
[17] Jacob JJ, Williams A, Verghese M, Afzal L. Crystalloid preload versus crystalloid coload for parturients undergoing cesarean section under spinal anesthesia. J Obstet Anaesth Crit Care 2012; 2:10-5.
[18] Dyer RA, Farina Z, Joubert IA, Du Toit P, Meyer M, Torr G, et al. Crystalloid preload versus rapid crystalloid administration after induction of spinal anaesthesia (coload) for elective caesarean section. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2004; 32: 351–7.
[19] Cardoso MM, Santos MM, Yamaguchi ET, Hirahara JT, Amaro AR. Fluid preload in obstetric patients. How to do it? Rev Bras Anestesiol. 2004; 54(1): 13-9.
[20] Rao AR, Vijaya G, Mahendra B.V.V.N. Comparison of Effects of Preloading and Coloading with Ringer Lactate in Elective Caesarean Section Cases under Spinal Anaesthesia. IOSR Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences. 2015; 14(10):57-64
[21] Oh AY, Hwang JW, Song IA, Kim MH, Ryu JH, Park HP, et al. Influence of the timing of administration of crystalloid on maternal hypotension during spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery: preload versus coload. BMC Anesthesiol. 2014; 14:36.
[22] Khan M, Waqar-ul-Nisai, Farooqi A, Ahmad N, Qaz S. Crystalloid co-load: a better option than crystalloid pre-load for prevention of postspinal hypotension in elective caesarean section. Internet J Anesthesiol 2013; 32(1).
| Files | ||
| Issue | Vol 8 No Supp. 1 (2022): Supplement 1 |
|
| Section | Research Article(s) | |
| Keywords | ||
| Blood Pressure Caesarean sections crystalloid Heart rate | ||
| Rights and permissions | |
|
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
