Research Article

A Comparative Study of Ropivacaine with and without Fentanyl for Caudal Anesthesia in Pediatric Patients

Abstract

Background: One of the most prevalent regional methods in paediatric anaesthesia is the caudal epidural block. It is a safe, simple procedure that has proven to be quite beneficial in children following infra-umbilical surgery. Ropivacaine causes differential neuraxial blockade, which is associated with less motor block and lower cardiovascular damage. To extend the duration of action of local anaesthetics, several adjuvants are administered. Our goal was to see how fentanyl affected the duration of postoperative analgesia when used in conjunction with ropivacaine in a paediatric population of children aged 3 to 8 years following infraumbilical operations.
Methods: On 100 paediatric patients receiving elective infraumbilical operations, a prospective, comparative, and randomised investigation was done. Patients were randomised into two 50-person groups at random. Caudal anaesthesia was administered once the airway was secured. 0.2 percent ropivacaine 0.5ml/kg was given to Group R, while 0.2 percent ropivacaine 0.5ml/kg with fentanyl 0.5mcg/kg was given to Group RF. Face, legs, activity, cry, and consolability pain rating scales were used to measure postoperative pain for 24 hours. The length of the motor blockage and any negative effects were recorded. Hemodynamics, post-operative analgesia duration, and the number of rescue analgesics required were all recorded and statistically evaluated.
Results: The mean duration of analgesia in ropivacaine group was 440.60±101.29 minutes (7.25hrs) and in ropivacaine fentanyl group was 891±312.84 (14.76hrs). Statistically, the difference was highly significant.
Conclusion: In children having infraumbilical surgery, using fentanyl as an adjuvant to ropivacaine for caudal block enhanced analgesic effectiveness and extended post-operative analgesia.

[1] Pain terms: a list with definitions and notes on usage. Recommended by the IASP subcommittee on taxonomy. Pain. 1979; 6: 249.
[2] Ganeshnavar A, Joshi C, Masur S, Hulkund SY. Comparison of dexmedetomidine and clonidine as adjuvants to 0.25% bupivacaine in paediatric caudal block for infraumbilical surgeries. Intl.Jclin. Diag.Res.2015;3 (4).
[3] Palkhiwla BB, Gajjar HR., Shah R. Study of caudal anesthesia with ropivacaine under sedation for infraumbilical surgery in paediatrics patients: NHL .Journal of Medical Sciences.2014; 3(1):37-40.
[4] McClellan KJ, Faulds D. Ropivacaine: an update of its use in regional anaesthesia. Drugs. 2000; 60(5):1065-93.
[5] Henthorn TK, Liu Y, Mahapatro M, Ng KY. Active transport of fentanyl by the blood-brain barrier. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1999; 289 (2):1084-9.
[6] Chakravarthy K, Anupuram LN, Cherukuri SK, Nalagandla SR, Konda RRM. Evaluation of caudal epidural with bupivacaine 0.20% versus ropivacaine 0.2% for post operative pain relief in paediatric lower abdominal surgeries. IOSR Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences.2016;15(1):47-51.
[7] Ali G, Kala N, Rather MA, Taj A, Maqbool S, Bhat KA. Comparative evaluation of caudal ropivacaine and ropivacaine with clonidine for postoperative analgesia in children. IOSR Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences. 2015;14(9): 50-54.
[8] Gupta P, Sharma P, Jethava D, Jethava DD. A comparison of Ropivacaine alone and in combination with fentanyl for caudal analgesia in pediatric patients. J Med Dent Sci. 2014;13(11):1-4.
[9] Senugupta S, Mukherji S, Sheet J, Mandal A, Swaika S. Caudal-epidural bupivacaine versus ropivacaine with fentanyl for paediatric postoperative analgesia. Anesth Essays Res. 2015; 9:208-12.
[10] Anand VG, Kannan M, Thavamani A, Bridgit MJ. Effects of dexmedetomidine added to caudal ropivacaine in pediatric lower abdominal surgeries. Indian J Anesth. 2011; 55:340-6.
[11] Bosenberg A, Thomas J, Lopez T, Lybeck A, Huizar K, Larsson LE. The efficacy of caudal ropivacaine 1, 2 and 3 mg•ml−1 for postoperative analgesia in children. Paediatr Anaesth. 2002; 12: 53–58.
[12] Shukla U, Prabhakar T, Malhotra K. Postoperative analgesia in children when using clonidine or fentanyl with ropivacaine given caudally. J Anesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2011; 27:205–10.
[13] Saini S, Patodi V, Sethi SK, Jain N, Mathur P, Thada B. Comparison of caudal epidural clonidine with fentanyl as an adjuvant to ropivacaine 0.25% for postoperative analgesia in children undergoing various infraumbilical surgeries: A prospective randomized study. Ain-Shams J Anaesthesiol. 2016; 9:493-500.
[14] Kawaraguchi Y, Otomo T, Ota C, Uchida N, Taniguchi A, Inoue S. A prospective, double-blind, randomized trial of caudal block using ropivacaine 0.2% with or without fentanyl 1 μg kg−1 in children. Br J Anaesth. 2006;97(6): 858-61.
[15] Rao MP, Babu SP, Saroj P. A randomised, double-blind, prospective study of caudal ropivacaine versus ropivacaine with fentanyl versus ropivacaine with neostigmine for combined epidural and general anaesthesia in children. J Evolution Med Dent Sci. 2017; 6(44):3459-68.
[16] Khatavkar SS, Lonkar SS, Panchal PB, Thatte WS, Nagendra S, Tewari D. The efficacy of ropivacaine fentanyl versus ropivacaine-clonidine for pre-emptive caudal anesthesia in children. Anaesth Pain & Intensive Care. 2016; 20(1):54-8.
Files
IssueVol 9 No 1 (2023): Winter QRcode
SectionResearch Article(s)
DOI https://doi.org/10.18502/aacc.v9i1.11937
Keywords
Caudal Pediatric Postoperative Fentanyl Ropivacaine

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
1.
Batul R, Gulzar U, Qayoom O. A Comparative Study of Ropivacaine with and without Fentanyl for Caudal Anesthesia in Pediatric Patients. Arch Anesth & Crit Care. 2022;9(1):4-8.