Research Article

Comparison of the Intubation Success Rate in Video Laryngoscopy versus Direct Laryngoscopy in Patients with Philadelphia Collar: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Abstract

Background: Video laryngoscopy (VL) and direct laryngoscopy (DL) are two approaches to provide secure airway for patients with compromised airways. This study aims to compare the intubation success rate in video laryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy in patients with Philadelphia collars.
Methods: 172 patients with cervical collars who have undergone general anesthesia were enrolled. After induction of anesthesia for all patients, an oral airway was used to facilitate the ventilation. A VL approach in Group A and DL approach in Group B were used. In order to evaluate the effectiveness of each method, we considered related parameters, including intubation time, the number of intubation attempts, Cormack-Lehane (CL) score, orodental injuries, heart rate, and blood pressure 3 minutes after intubation, oxygen saturation, neck circumference, and BMI.
Results: The ratio of first-attempt intubations was not different among the two groups (P = 1.00). The mean [SD] time for intubation was shorter with DL vs VL (p<0.0001). There were almost equal rates of CL grades 1 and 2 (67.5% and 29%) using the VL than with the. The mean [SD] mean arterial pressure in VL vs DL was 86.17 mmHg vs 90.88 mmHg (p = 0.086).
Conclusion: According to our results, there was no significant difference in complications and hemodynamic changes after intubation in both groups, but the intubation duration was significant shorter in DL group.

[1] Paix A, Williamson J, Runciman W. Crisis management during anaesthesia: difficult intubation. Qual Saf Health Care. 2005; 14(3):e5.
[2] Xu R, Lian Y, Li WX. Airway complications during and after general anesthesia: a comparison, systematic review and meta-analysis of using flexible laryngeal mask airways and endotracheal tubes. PLoS One. 2016; 11(7):e0158137.
[3] Silverberg MJ, Li N, Acquah SO, Kory PD. Comparison of video laryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy during urgent endotracheal intubation: a randomized controlled trial. Crit Care Med. 2015; 43(3):636-41.
[4] Mort TC. Emergency tracheal intubation: complications associated with repeated laryngoscopic attempts. Anesth Analg. 2004; 99(2):607-13.
[5] Jaber S, Jung B, Corne P, Sebbane M, Muller L, Chanques G, et al. An intervention to decrease complications related to endotracheal intubation in the intensive care unit: a prospective, multiple-center study. Intensive Care Med. 2010; 36(2):248-55.
[6] Joffe AM, Aziz MF, Posner KL, Duggan LV, Mincer SL, Domino KB. Management of difficult tracheal intubation: a closed claims analysis. Anesthesiology. 2019; 131(4):818-29.
[7] Engelhardt T, Fiadjoe JE, Weiss M, Baker P, Bew S, Echeverry Marín P, et al. A framework for the management of the pediatric airway. Paediatr Anaesth. 2019; 29(10):985-92.
[8] Standards UbtCo, Parameters P, Apfelbaum JL, Hagberg CA, Caplan RA, Blitt CD, et al. Practice guidelines for management of the difficult airway: an updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Management of the Difficult Airway. Anesthesiology. 2013;118(2):251-70.
[9] Kortbeek JB, Al Turki SA, Ali J, Antoine JA, Bouillon B, Brasel K, et al. Advanced trauma life support, the evidence for change. J Trauma. 2008;64(6):1638-50.
[10] Serigano O, Riscinti M. Cervical spine motion restriction after blunt trauma. Acad Emerg Med. 2021; 28(4):472-4.
[11] Goutcher C, Lochhead V. Reduction in mouth opening with semi-rigid cervical collars. Br J Anaesth. 2005; 95(3):344-8.
[12] Heath K. The effect on laryngoscopy of different cervical spine immobilization techniques. Anaesthesia. 1994; 49(10):843-5.
[13] Morley A, Haji-Michael P, Mahoney P. Cervical spine control during prehospital tracheal intubation of trauma victims. Anaesthesia. 1995; 50(7):661-2.
[14] Komatsu R, Nagata O, Kamata K, Yamagata K, Sessler DI, Ozaki M. Intubating laryngeal mask airway allows tracheal intubation when the cervical spine is immobilized by a rigid collar. Br J Anaesth. 2004;93(5):655-9.
[15] Berkow LC, Morey TE, Urdaneta F. The technology of video laryngoscopy. Anesth Analg. 2018; 126(5):1527-34.
[16] Maharaj C, O'croinin D, Curley G, Harte B, Laffey J. A comparison of tracheal intubation using the Airtraq® or the Macintosh laryngoscope in routine airway management: a randomised, controlled clinical trial. Anaesthesia. 2006; 61(11):1093-9.
[17] Sun Y, Lu Y, Huang Y, Jiang H. Pediatric video laryngoscope versus direct laryngoscope: a meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials. Paediatr Anaesth. 2014; 24(10):1056-65.
[18] Kumar GP, Kulkarni AP, Govil D, Dixit SB, Chaudhry D, Samavedam S, et al. Airway Management and Related Procedures in Critically Ill COVID-19 Patients: Position Statement of the Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine. Indian J Crit Care Med. 2020;24(8):630-42.
[19] Mizutamari E, Yano T, Ushijima K, Ito A, Anraku S, Tanimoto H, et al. A comparison of postoperative sore throat after use of laryngeal mask airway and tracheal tube. J Anesth. 2004; 18(3):151-7.
[20] Mosier JM, Sakles JC, Stolz U, Hypes CD, Chopra H, Malo J, et al. Neuromuscular blockade improves first-attempt success for intubation in the intensive care unit. A propensity matched analysis. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2015; 12(5):734-41.
[21] Vivek B, Sripriya R, Mishra G, Ravishankar M, Parthasarathy S. Comparison of success of tracheal intubation using Macintosh laryngoscope-assisted Bonfils fiberscope and Truview video laryngoscope in simulated difficult airway. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2017; 33(1):107.
[22] Guyette FX, Farrell K, Carlson JN, Callaway CW, Phrampus P. Comparison of video laryngoscopy and direct laryngoscopy in a critical care transport service. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2013; 17(2):149-54.
[23] Lambert RC, Ban C, Rivera AU, Eckert GJ, Krishnan DG, Bennett JD. Comparison of direct laryngoscopy and video laryngoscopy in intubating a mannequin: Should video laryngoscopy be available to manage airway emergencies in the oral and maxillofacial surgery office J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015; 73(10):1901-6.
Files
IssueVol 9 No 2 (2023): Spring QRcode
SectionResearch Article(s)
DOI https://doi.org/10.18502/aacc.v9i2.12516
Keywords
General anesthesia Intubation Laryngoscopy

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
1.
Atef-Yekta R, Heroabadi A, Karami A. Comparison of the Intubation Success Rate in Video Laryngoscopy versus Direct Laryngoscopy in Patients with Philadelphia Collar: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Arch Anesth & Crit Care. 2022;9(2):165-170.