Comparison of Two Different Volumes of Epidural Normal Saline for Enhancing the Effects of Spinal Anesthesia in Adult Patients Undergoing Elective Lower Limb Surgeries: A Prospective Randomized Study
Abstract
Background: The combined spinal-epidural (CSE) anesthesia technique gives a reliable subarachnoid block as well as the flexible epidural block. One of the modified technique of CSE is epidural volume expansion (EVE) in which normal saline or local anesthetic (LA) is instilled though epidural catheter leading to increase in level of sensory blockade. Aim of the study was to compare two different volumes of normal saline for enhancing the effects of spinal anaesthesia in adult patients undergoing elective lower limb surgeries.
Methods: 90 patients were randomly divided into two group. Group A - 45 patients who were received intrathecal 2.0ml of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine and epidural 10ml of 0.9% normal saline for EVE using CSE technique. Group B - 45 patients who were received intrathecal 2.0ml of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine and epidural 15ml of 0.9% normal saline for EVE using CSE technique.
Results: The demographic data were comparable in both groups. Significant difference was seen in total duration of sensory blockade between group A (192.11±9.80) and group B (Mean ± SD 215.33±17.57minutes) (p<0.0001). Total duration of motor blockade was longer in group B (Mean± SD: 181.91± 16.42) as compared to group A (Mean ± SD: 162.48 ± 9.35 minutes) (p<0.0001).
Conclusion: We conclude that epidural volume expansion (EVE) with 15 ml epidural normal saline was associated with faster onset, higher level and early achieve maximum level of sensory blockade, longer two segment regression time, early onset and longer duration of motor blockade as compared to EVE with 10 ml epidural normal saline.
[2] Kattamanchi S, Tharigonda B, Meenakshi GS, Neelakrishnaveni K. A Comparative Randomized Control Study of Continuous Spinal Anaesthesia with Continuous Epidural Anaesthesia in Elderly Patients Undergoing Dynamic Hip Screw Surgeries. Arch Anesth & Crit Care. 2022; 8(Supplement):387-392.
[3] Lew E, Yeo SW, Thomas E. Combined spinal-epidural anaesthesia using epidural volume extension leads to faster motor recovery after elective cesarean delivery: a prospective, randomized, double-blind study. Anesth Analg. 2004; 98:810-4.
[4] Kar-Binh Ong, R Sashidharan. Combined spinal–epidural techniques. Continuing Education in Anaesthesia Critical Care & Pain. 2007;7: 38–41.
[5] Okasha MM, Kamal S, Ramzy A. Epidural volume extension with saline in combined spinal epidural anaesthesia for dynamic hip screw surgeries using low dose of intrathecal hyperbaric bupivacaine. Ain-Shams Journal of Anesthesiology. 2014; 07:350.
[6] Manouchehrian N, Kimiaei Asadi H, Rabiei S, Moradi A, Nosrati M. Comparison of the Effect of Epidural Bolus and Continuous Infusion of Lidocaine %1 on Pain, the Progress of Vaginal Delivery and Motor Function in Labor Epidural Analgesia. Arch Anesth & Crit Care. 2021;7(1):12-18.
[7] Tyagi A, Sharma CS, Kumar S, Sharma DK, Jain AK, Sethi AK. Epidural volume extension: a review. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2012; 40:604-13.
[8] Doganci N, Apan A, Tekin O, Kaymak C. Epidural volume expansion: Is there a ceiling effect? Minerva Anestesiol. 2010; 76:334-9.
[9] Blumgart CH, Ryall D, Dennison B, Thomson-Hill LM. Mechanism of extension of spinal anaesthesia by extradural injection of local anaesthetic. Br J Anaesth. 1992; 69:457-60.
[10] Higuchi H, Adachi Y, Kazama T. Effects of epidural saline injection on cerebrospinal fluid volume and velocity waveform: A magnetic resonance imaging study. Anesthesiology. 2005; 102:285-92.
[11] Sherin MA. Epidural volume expansion and single shot spinal anesthesia, for elective caesarean section. AAMJ. 2012; 10:285-306.
[12] Stienstra R, Dahan A, Alhadi BZ, Kleef JW, Burm AGL. Mechanism of action of an epidural top up in combined spinal epidural anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 1996; 83: 382.
[13] Chirayanth J, Dhanpal R. Evaluation of effects of an epidural top up in combined spinal epidural Anaesthesia. Indian J Anaesth. 2002; 46(3):197-8.
[14] Choi DH, Park NK, Cho HS, Hahm TS, Chung IS. Effects of epidural injection on spinal block during combined spinal and epidural anesthesia for caesarean delivery. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2000; 25:591-5.
[15] Tyagi A, Sharma CS, Kumar S, Sharma DK, Jain AK, Sethi AK. Epidural volume extension: a review. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2012; 40(4):604-13.
[16] Loubert C, O’Brien PJ, Fernando R, Walton N, Philip S, Addei T, et al. Epidural volume extension in combined spinal epidural anaesthesia for elective caesarean section: A randomised controlled trial. Anaesthesia. 2011; 66:341-7.
[17] Goy RWL, Sia ATH. Sensorimotor anesthesia and hypotension after subarachnoid block: Combined spinal epidural versus single shot spinal technique. Anesth Analg. 2004; 98:491-6.
[18] Sherin MA. Epidural volume expansion and single shot spinal anesthesia, for elective caesarean section. AAMJ. 2012; 10:285-306.
Files | ||
Issue | Vol 10 No 2 (2024): Spring | |
Section | Research Article(s) | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.18502/aacc.v10i2.15063 | |
Keywords | ||
Combined Spinal-Epidural Epidural Volume Expansion Motor Blockade Sensory Blockade |
Rights and permissions | |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |