Does Early Initiation of Labor Epidural Analgesia Affect Labor Outcomes? A Randomized Clinical Trial
Abstract
Background: Although epidural analgesia (EA) is a popular and effective method for pain relief during labor, significant controversy exists in terms of the impact of EA on labor outcomes and the best time for initiation of EA. Here, we aim to explore the effects of early initiation EA on the labor process in nulliparous at-term pregnant women.
Methods: A total of 240 nulliparous women enrolled in this study. The early epidural (EE) group (n=120) consisted of women in the latent phase of labor and the late epidural (LE) group (n=120) were in the active phase of labor. Each group received 16 ml of 0.125% preservative-free isobaric bupivacaine with 50 µg fentanyl (total: 17 ml) as a primary bolus dose in the epidural space for labor analgesia and an intermittent bolus of 5-10 ml of the primary solution was administered via a catheter. The length of labor, rate of cesarean section (CS), neonatal well-being, and infant Apgar scores were recorded.
Results: There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups regarding the duration of the first (p=.43) and second (p=.54) phases of labor. No statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups in terms of the rate of CS (p=.21), causes for CS (p=.24), and neonatal Apgar scores (p=0.84).
Conclusion: Initiation of EA during early labor did not result in increased CS or instrumental vaginal deliveries, and did not prolong labor duration.
[2] Naik T, Acharya N, Shrivastav D, Chandak A, Samal S, Agrawal M. Comparative study of the effect of early versus late initiation of epidural analgesia on labour. Int J of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Neonatal Care. 2015; 2(3):26-32.
[3] Lee H-L, Lo L-M, Chou C-C, Chiang T-Y, Chuah E-C. Timing of initiating epidural analgesia and mode of delivery in nulliparas: A retrospective experience using ropivacaine. Chang Gung Med J. 2008; 31(4):395-401.
[4] Sng BL, Leong WL, Zeng Y, Siddiqui FJ, Assam PN, Lim Y, et al. Early versus late initiation of epidural analgesia for labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014(10).
[5] Wong CA, Scavone BM, Peaceman AM, McCarthy RJ, Sullivan JT, Diaz NT, et al. The risk of cesarean delivery with neuraxial analgesia given early versus late in labor. N Engl J Med. 2005; 352(7):655-65.
[6] Ohel G, Gonen R, Vaida S, Barak S, Gaitini L. Early versus late initiation of epidural analgesia in labor: does it increase the risk of cesarean section? A randomized trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006; 194(3):600-5.
[7] Thorp JA, Hu DH, Albin RM, McNitt J, Meyer BA, Cohen GR, et al. The effect of intrapartum epidural analgesia on nulliparous labor: a randomized, controlled, prospective trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1993; 169(4):851-8.
[8] Fung B. Continuous epidural analgesia for painless labor does not increase the incidence of cesarean delivery. Acta Anaesthesiol Sin. 2000; 38(2):79-84.
[9] Luxman D, Wolman I, Groutz A, Cohen J, Lottan M, Pauzner D, et al. The effect of early epidural block administration on the progression and outcome of labor. Int J Obstet Anesth. 1998; 7(3):161-4.
[10] Zha Y, Gong X, Yang C, Deng D, Feng L, Luo A, et al. Epidural analgesia during labor and its optimal initiation time-points: A real-world study on 400 Chinese nulliparas. Medicine. 2021; 100(9).
[11] Lipschuetz M, Nir EA, Cohen SM, Guedalia J, Hochler H, Amsalem H, et al. Cervical dilation at the time of epidural catheter insertion is not associated with the degree of prolongation of the first or second stages of labor, or the rate of instrumental vaginal delivery. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2020; 99(8):1039-49.
[12] Chestnut DH, Vincent RD, McGrath JM, Choi WW, Bates JN. Does early administration of epidural analgesia affect obstetric outcome in nulliparous women who are receiving intravenous oxytocin? Anesthesiology. 1994; 80(6):1193-200.
[13] Shiro M, Nakahata K, Minami S, Kawamata T, Ino K. Perinatal outcome of vaginal delivery with epidural analgesia initiated at the early or late phase of labor period: A retrospective cohort study in the Japanese population. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2018; 44(8):1415-23.
[14] Anim‐Somuah M, Smyth RM, Cyna AM, Cuthbert A. Epidural versus non‐epidural or no analgesia for pain management in labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018; 5(5).
Files | ||
Issue | Vol 10 No 2 (2024): Spring | |
Section | Research Article(s) | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.18502/aacc.v10i2.15065 | |
Keywords | ||
Epidural analgesia Labor Vaginal delivery |
Rights and permissions | |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |