Comparing the Hemodynamic Effects of Intravenous and Volatile Anesthesia in Patients with End Stage Renal Disease Undergoing Laparoscopic Implantation of Peritoneal Dialysis Catheter in a Randomized Double-Blind Clinical Trial
Abstract
Background: Due to the associated hypertension and cardiovascular disease in patients with ESRD hemodynamic changes during operations are detrimental and may be life-threatening. Therefore, hemodynamic stability is an important criterion in selecting the anesthetic approach.
Methods: 72 ASA class III/IV, ESRD Patients were studied in randomized double blind clinical trial. They were divided into two groups by four-block randomization. A group of patients were induced and maintained by etomidate and second of patients were induced by Na thiopental and maintained by isoflurane. Systolic, diastolic and mean arterial blood pressure and heart rate were measured at interval of pre and post induction, postintubation, pre and post abdominal insufflation during and at the end of surgery and in recovery. The total BP modulators were recorded and postoperative nausea and vomiting was registered in the recovery. Data were analyzed by STATA version 12.
Results: There was no significant difference in physical characteristics between two groups. There was no statistical difference between the groups in SBP and HR (P>0.05), although DBP fluctuation>20% at interval postinduction and prior to abdominal insufflation during surgery and at the end of surgery, was significantly higher in the isoflurane group of patients. (P=0.004, 0.001, 0.003 and 0.009, respectively). Also, the MAP fluctuation at interval of post induction, preinsufflation and at the end of surgery was significantly higher in isoflurane of patients. (P=0.04, 0.001, and 0.02, respectively).
Conclusion: The group anesthetized with isoflurane had a higher hemodynamic fluctuation, compared to the group anesthetized with etomidate. As hemodynamic changes are critical in patients with ESRD, etomidate is a more appropriate anesthetic choice for implantation of peritoneal dialysis catheter by laparoscopic approach.
[2] Jafarian A, Hassani V, Jesmi F, Ramezani K, Javaheri F, Shariatzadeh H. Efficacy of a Modified Bier's Block in Patients Undergoing Upper Limb Bone Surgery. Anesth Pain Med. 2015; 5(1):e22007.
[3] Meursing AE. Anaesthesia for day care surgery, patient selection, evaluation, preoperative preparation and selection of drugs. Acta anaesthesiologica Belgica. 1999; 50(1):29-34.
[4] Zambouri A. Preoperative evaluation and preparation for anesthesia and surgery. Hippokratia. 2007; 11(1):13-21.
[5] Pazouki A, Cheraghali R, Saeedimotahhar H, Jesmi F, Jangjoo A, Pishgahroudsari M. Pre-operative rectal indomethacin for reduction of postoperative nausea and vomiting after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a double-blind randomized clinical trial. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2015; 25(1):56-9.
[6] Hassani V, Movassaghi G, Goodarzi V, Safari S. Comparison of fentanyl and fentanyl plus lidocaine on attenuation of hemodynamic responses to tracheal intubation in controlled hypertensive patients undergoing general anesthesia. Anesth Pain Med. 2013; 2(3):115-8.
[7] Robertshaw H, Hall G. Diabetes mellitus: anaesthetic management. Anaesthesia. 2006; 61(12):1187-90.
[8] Fleisher LA, Beckman JA, Brown KA, Calkins H, Chaikof EL, Fleischmann KE, et al. ACC/AHA 2007 guidelines on perioperative cardiovascular evaluation and care for noncardiac surgery. Circulation. 2007;116(17):e418-e500.
[9] Landoni G, Greco T, Biondi-Zoccai G, Neto CN, Febres D, Pintaudi M, et al. Anaesthetic drugs and survival: a Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized trials in cardiac surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2013; 111(6):886-96.
[[10] Kaushal RP, Vatal A, Pathak R. Effect of etomidate and propofol induction on hemodynamic and endocrine response in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting/mitral valve and aortic valve replacement surgery on cardiopulmonary bypass. Ann Card Anaesth. 2015; 18(2):172.
[11] Pandey AK, Makhija N, Chauhan S, Das S, Kiran U, Bisoi AK, et al. The effects of etomidate and propofol induction on hemodynamic and endocrine response in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery on cardiopulmonary bypass. World journal of cardiovascular surgery. 2012; 2(03):48.
[12] Domi R, Sula H, Ohri I, Beqiri A, Kaci M, Bodeci A, et al. Anesthetic challenges of patients with cardiac comorbidities undergoing major urologic surgery. Int Arch Med. 2014; 7(1):17.
[13] Stenglova A, Benes J. Continuous Non-Invasive Arterial Pressure Assessment during Surgery to Improve Outcome. Front Med (Lausanne). 2017; 4:202.
[14] Soontrapornchai P, Simapatanapong T. Comparison of open and laparoscopic secure placement of peritoneal dialysis catheters. Surg Endosc. 2005; 19(1):137-9.
[15] Weiner DE, Tighiouart H, Amin MG, Stark PC, MacLeod B, Griffith JL, et al. Chronic kidney disease as a risk factor for cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality: a pooled analysis of community-based studies. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2004; 15(5):1307-15.
[16] Ioannou CV, Stergiopulos N, Georgakarakos E, Chatzimichali E, Katsamouris AN, Morel DR. Effects of isoflurane anesthesia on aortic compliance and systemic hemodynamics in compliant and noncompliant aortas. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2013; 27(6):1282-8.
[17] Morris C, Perris A, Klein J, Mahoney P. Anaesthesia in haemodynamically compromised emergency patients: does ketamine represent the best choice of induction agent? Anaesthesia. 2009; 64(5):532-9.
[18] Jellish SW, Sheikh T, Baker WH, Louie EK, Slogoff S. Hemodynamic stability, myocardial ischemia, and perioperative outcome after carotid surgery with remifentanil/propofol or isoflurane/fentanyl anesthesia J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2003; 15(3):176-84.
[19] Hosseinzadeh H, Golzari SE, Torabi E, Dehdilani M. Hemodynamic changes following anesthesia induction and LMA insertion with propofol, etomidate, and propofol+ etomidate. J Cardiovasc Thorac Res. 2013; 5(3):109-12.
[20] Oglesby A. Should etomidate be the induction agent of choice for rapid sequence intubation in the emergency department? Emerg Med J. 2004; 21(6):655-9.
[21] Zed PJ, Abu‐Laban RB, Harrison DW. Intubating conditions and hemodynamic effects of etomidate for rapid sequence intubation in the emergency department: an observational cohort study. Acad Emerg Med. 2006; 13(4):378-83.
[22] Lairez O, Lonjaret L, Ruiz S, Marchal P, Franchitto N, Calise D, et al. Anesthetic regimen for cardiac function evaluation by echocardiography in mice: comparison between ketamine, etomidate and isoflurane versus conscious state. Lab Anim. 2013; 47(4):284-90.
[23] Paris A, Philipp M, Tonner PH, Steinfath M, Lohse M, Scholz J, et al. Activation of alpha 2B-adrenoceptors mediates the cardiovascular effects of etomidate. Anesthesiology. 2003; 99(4):889-95.
[24] Vinson DR, Bradbury DR. Etomidate for procedural sedation in emergency medicine. Ann Emerg Med. 2002; 39(6):592-8.
[25] Baradari AG, Firouzian A, Kiasari AZ, Aarabi M, Emadi SA, Davanlou A, et al. Effect of etomidate versus combination of propofol-ketamine and thiopental-ketamine on hemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and intubation: a randomized double blind clinical trial. Anesth Pain Med. 2016; 6(1).
[26] Giese JL, Stockham RJ, Stanley TH, Pace NL, Nelissen RH. Etomidate versus thiopental for induction of anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 1985; 64(9):871-6.
[27] Nazemroaya B, Babaei E. Comparison of Recovery Time and Complications During the Use of Etomidate and Thiopental Sodium in Anesthesia in Children for Electroconvulsive Therapy; A Double Blind Randomized Clinical Trial. Archives of Anesthesiology and Critical Care. 2017;3(1):283-90.
| Files | ||
| Issue | Vol 10 No 4 (2024): Autumn |
|
| Section | Research Article(s) | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.18502/aacc.v10i4.16259 | |
| Keywords | ||
| Hemodynamic Monitoring Etomidate Isoflurane Laparoscopy Peritoneal Catheter | ||
| Rights and permissions | |
|
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
